Wow, this is great!
However, I would suggest you go over some of the sentences you wrote, because some of them are empty sentences the way the are right now.
The one that caught my eye in particular was on
this page (September 1). The last sentence reads "The 3 Panda variation are popular, and while the tiger and leopard rats are interesting, the subtle black rat is well designed."
My problem with that sentence is that simply using "interesting" and "well designed" doesn't really tell you much. You should go into more detail. So when you say something is interesting, you should specify *why* they are interesting, and when saying something is "well designed", tell us *how* it is well designed. You can get away with not specifying why they are interesting in this case (assuming you are saying they are interesting because they hav leopard and tiger design. You might want to change it to "interesting to look at"), but the "well designed" in reference to that one rat design makes me ask myself "Are the others not well designed?". Tell us why this particular rat stands out from the crowd.
This is of course just intended as a friendly suggestion, and constructive criticism. Similar to how a teacher in Literature class would correct your essay (in fact, I think I once got the very same advise, to not write empty phrases and go into detail instead, from a teacher in school, long, long ago.).
But still, this is great. Well done!