Emon De Lucifian wrote:DaisyTheory wrote:Sigh, no one will even accept overpay for the Raven dog. The few that have him, wont take the grinner+ a low advent.
grinners have poor demand, they might be worth more rarity wise, but demand wise, the Raven beats them by a long shot, don't give up though!

Leopardy wrote:Aperture Science wrote:WARNING: This may burn your eyes out
My poor eyes q_q
That is horrible!
The Emo Vampire wrote:i was looking through my old trades
i found a person who said read their rules
i did, and it said
i will never have any rules
yeah, some good that will do
>__<
♠ Emo
Emon De Lucifian wrote:DaisyTheory wrote:Sigh, no one will even accept overpay for the Raven dog. The few that have him, wont take the grinner+ a low advent.
grinners have poor demand, they might be worth more rarity wise, but demand wise, the Raven beats them by a long shot, don't give up though!



*~Dark Sharni~* wrote:Emon De Lucifian wrote:DaisyTheory wrote:Sigh, no one will even accept overpay for the Raven dog. The few that have him, wont take the grinner+ a low advent.
grinners have poor demand, they might be worth more rarity wise, but demand wise, the Raven beats them by a long shot, don't give up though!
The rares list already takes demand into account when placing pets. Where they are is how much they are worth. It's because of the double demand of people continuously overpaying on purpose that raises the increase of demand. When someone pays a lot for something, they think they deserve that or higher when they trade it (even if unfair) So everyone has to continuously pay more in order to get what they want.

Aperture Science wrote:So tempting.... but something is holding me back from accepting...



Users browsing this forum: Nicnova, OAI [Search], Oxycóccus and 1 guest