locoexclaimer wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=81325761&userid=44306&signature=iGYVowQ4XckAS99m3Ev3wQ
Disregard that it is cancelled - I think it was an accident - it's a bid for an auction that is about to end
I just need to know, is that rat really worth a sorb?



Honeycreeper66 wrote:Honeycreeper66 wrote:my trading partner days that they value 2014 store pets at 2 '09 rares each, what could be added to make this fair to us both? thank you for any help!
boomp
honey
locoexclaimer wrote:locoexclaimer wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=81325761&userid=44306&signature=iGYVowQ4XckAS99m3Ev3wQ
Disregard that it is cancelled - I think it was an accident - it's a bid for an auction that is about to end
I just need to know, is that rat really worth a sorb?
Honeycreeper66 wrote:my trading partner days that they value 2014 store pets at 2 '09 rares each, what could be added to make this fair to us both? thank you for any help!
boomp
honey
swiftheart54 wrote:is this pretty fair? thanks in advance
trades/viewtrade.php?id=81327886&userid=351237&signature=c-SCudwhMmgKqpuCAKfy8A
Catsinsideofbananas wrote:Could I get some other opinions of this?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=81325900&userid=950685&signature=9eNaYjk2GBsJE4Tod8qCXA
Naps wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=81307456&userid=638504&signature=M5ygsRdYPYun_8noim14nA
Is this fair, considering rarity and your personal demand? Would you accept this? Thank you for any help!!


Fedsat3 wrote:
Fedsat3 wrote:Fedsat3 wrote:
Direwolf_1411225 wrote:Catsinsideofbananas wrote:Could I get some other opinions of this?
trades/viewtrade.php?id=81325900&userid=950685&signature=9eNaYjk2GBsJE4Tod8qCXA
I think that’s unfair to them. The dog’s true date is actually ‘09, I believe, so you would need two ‘09 rares, or 4 ‘10 rares, you only have one ‘10 and a ‘14, which isn’t equal. As for the C$, it still doesn’t balance out much. Maybe even more, depends how they value the dog. Horses are also really low demand and hard to trade off.
Direwolf_1411225 wrote:
Again, not really. I feel like you are overpaying, they’d have to offer more. If you see, let’s take their rare and one of your closer/same year rares and match them up. Fair, I assume? So now take your other three rares and their few commons and very commons, and one uncommon. IMO commons and VC, and only one UC would be terribly unfair for three rares, especially because your rates are older ones. Again just an opinion, and I’m really really sorry for posting so much, I’m probably annoying, I’m just tryna help people. Again it all depends how you value your rares, some will think that that’s fair, others won’t.
Users browsing this forum: Nicnova, OAI [Search], Oxycóccus and 1 guest