CS Items Guide - Help update values - Medieval Faire Tokens

[sinpai]

Yes, I think a range would be better for the scarves. Giving them a range may help more trades come in (since some people might want to hang on to them until they get a set value) and they can maybe be narrowed down more from there.

I have a question about the pocky, how many were given out in the Christmas set? I spent some time looking around a while back at some older users items and it appears a lot of them have three. It might be a coincident, but I haven't really found the pocky to be hard to find.

one; Range would be amazing but what does everyone think the set value should be?

Two; I have found the Pocky easy to find as well and have been curious of how rare it really is as well since it also has a good circulation as well, wether it's being auctioned or just traded normally, I have even seen a few people with 5-10

[ElementalInsanity]

The items may do even better with just keeping them at ranges without necessarily being narrowed down just to add that in. We don’t know rarities on them so it’s a lot harder to narrow it down to specifics.
That’s just why I feel ranges in general may be better even to just keep them at that. ^^

I think the Pocky may be a thing of circulation? It seems just because them being popular they may go around fairly often.

[sinpai]

I think I said that first one wrong aha
I mean what range should we put on the full set? Or are we just doing the individual range? ^^

[ElementalInsanity]

I was commenting more towards Wookie who said after a while we could even narrow down the range to a more set tier, but I feel ranges with items like this fits better for reasons stated in my post. ^^
Tho yeah haha yours confused me too, lol. I get know you mean the full scarf set tho haha

Deciding for the full set may be a bit harder, but I feel another range would be a good idea?

[lucky333123]

I agree about the scarves having a range.

For the pocky, I think it is partially due to circulation, but I think it is also due to the fact that they are popular hence people like to have more than one. At one point, I had 5 of them but that was due to a quitting user giving me 4 of them when they quit the site around 4-5 years ago.

[Solloby]

I like the suggested individual scarf range of Mid Advent to Low September c:

The full scarf set I feel should be worth a main list, there's value in having a full set vs individual scarves. We don't have many trades involving 5-7 scarves, but some have gone for main lists and 7x low septs has to be worth main list surely. Like a balloon dog or something? Maybe "Low Main List" is a good value guide?

Regarding the Pocky, I think each user got 5 of them, so they were never that rare compared to other items because everyone had lots of extras. I've apparently traded my spares off, so can't be 100% sure on the number though.

[lucky333123]

I would say low to maybe a nonballoon tier main list range for the whole scarf set. Reason is the likelihood of finding someone who has all and is willing to trade them is not as high as finding one or two scarves.

[SabrinaB]

Placing them too high will only feed the demand more.
They already go for more than their worth, but we shouldnt feed the demand too much

[ElementalInsanity]

Placing them too high will only feed the demand more.
They already go for more than their worth, but we shouldnt feed the demand too much

Agreed, hence why I was for doing the range for the single scarves instead of putting it at the highest it goes for. Which I also feel should be done for the set.

I would suggest more along the lines of a high September, like dark leopard tier or grey dragon tier, to maybe purple horse tier mainlist?

My reasoning for this-
If we’re placing the scarves each from a range of mid advent to low September list that’s about 1MA to 2MA each.
By seven in a set that’s about 7MA to 14MA.
Grey dragon is 8MA, a bit more for set convenience, to Purple horse tier 15MA.

I personally think nonballon is a bit high. (35MA)

Or if we’re honestly wanting to do higher tiers I would say low mainlist to pink balloon tier, (21MA).
So as solloby said, lol, maybe just low mainlist to pink balloon tier.

[sinpai]

couldn't we just say low mainlist if we give it the range up to a pink balloon tier since it is a low mainlist? Or is that just so some people understand that the pink balloon is a low mainlist?