Zoroark wrote:rileypillow wrote:If you find an outcome disturbing, you can use Adblocker, right click the image, and block in the same manner that you’d block an ad. There are several other pets on the site that could be classed as triggering/body horror/etc., but that’s another topic altogether.
Thanks for bringing that option up! It's going to be helpful for at least avoiding that outcome generally -- but what about dress-ups of it? Am I going to be getting blindsided every time someone has one of them in their sig with some kind of item attached because the adblocker doesn't recognize the base element as the one I've blocked?
Oddity-Lad wrote:I do appreciate this being brought up. I did however thoroughly confirm with admin that Oozrook didn't break any CS art rules in regards to body horror and just generally being frightening and they did pass every time.
While that's perfectly fine, Staff is by no means the end-all-be-all of what's going to be triggering or disturbing for people. I think it's impossible for a small group to be able to accurately judge what's going to be a potential issue. It doesn't break rules, but the fact remains that it is disturbing to some users, and I feel that should be taken into account.
Oddity-Lad wrote:For me personally they fall into a category of natural deformities much like the two faced cow or any animal or even human with extra limbs. Which though can be frightening, largely comes from a place of being uncomfortable over something we don't understand and isn't really body horror.
This is a false equivalency. We are not discussing natural deformities, nor people with extra limbs: we are discussing a piece of art that verges on body horror, most specifically eye horror/trauma (which is something that I have significant problems with generally, and which this particular piece of art sets off). I have no issues with natural deformities or animal or human mutations -- in point of fact, I'd be delighted to own a polydactyl cat someday (I love their mittens): I have issues coming across a piece of art with no warning that sets off my eye trauma discomfort.
Oddity-Lad wrote:I will also add that Oozrook has no body, no bones, no muscles, and can therefore take on whatever shape they wish, a cat with ten legs, sure. A biblically accurate cat that's just a mass of eyes and wings, not out of the realm of possibility.
Again, this is not the issue being discussed. The issue is that the image presently on CS utilized for this specific pet outcome sets off the eye trauma/horror discomfort response for some users, including myself. If Oozrook
were a biblically accurate cat that's just a mass of wings and eyes, we could discuss that -- but it's not.
Oddity-Lad wrote:As a queer man I have also grown up knowing my very existence disturbs people and makes them uncomfortable so I do try to be wholly myself whenever I can and introducing my first pet to Chicken Smoothie is such a symbolic point in my life I really didn't want to do what I thought people would find comfortable, I wanted to do something that would show people who I am, and I do apologize if that isn't palettable.
Queer people are not a monolith. I myself am a queer non-binary person, and I find the image of this cat disturbing not because of what it represents, but because of a very specific aspect of the art in the eye where the faces split. It isn't about being "palatable," it's about being courteous to people with triggers or major discomforts surrounding body horror with eye trauma, which is an extremely common trigger.
My intention is not to be confrontational, and I by no means intend to invalidate, dismiss, or minimize Oozrook's importance to you as the artist -- I absolutely respect how much care and thought and effort went into its creation! But my concern is that eye horror is a common trigger for people -- myself included -- and this is a public site widely used by kids and teenagers which does not currently support an option to filter out pets that they find disturbing: if they're triggered by the eye horror aspect of this outcome, they have no recourse except to leave the site.