Trade Rant thread V. 22 {New Thread!}

My gallery · by **Lake Petal** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:05 pm

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... WBxF3vvImA
Nope. 'rarities matter' is a common rule, but anyone agree with me when I say it is ALWAYS broken?

My gallery · by **deepseaolive** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:33 pm

I just got a message from someone asking what I'd give for their Cheshire cat.
I offered, asking what they were interested in, and when I checked again, the suggestion was cancelled. No message.
Then they messaged me and asked
a)why I didn't put the Cheshire in the suggestion (completely slipped my mind), and then said:
b) they weren't trading, they just wanted to know what I would offer.
Why ;~;

DC scroll · by **InfernoVulpes** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:35 pm

Fabled Promises wrote:
Poppet's Puzzle wrote:
I get thisWhich I cancel saying no thanks, because I do not think it is a fair offer
Then they send this asking "is this any better?"

/lolzwat

Ouch wait I can't see anymore where is my eyes

-feels around for them-

My gallery · by **Piera** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:57 pm

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Xw6N36c9Ug
Sent this suggestion because i missed those outcomes and cause i like the lion and they had doubles
They changed it to this
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... IGbgl-YL4A
I think i should take the rat off my wishlist,quite a few people think im willing to trade anything for it

My gallery · by **Lufi** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 10:59 pm

Are you kidding me?

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... tUoccUqo8A

My gallery · by **Gigglebug** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:01 pm

NightofnewRose wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=23743777&userid=326324&signature=cy40JdKVJ-f6WBxF3vvImA
Nope. 'rarities matter' is a common rule, but anyone agree with me when I say it is ALWAYS broken?

Please correct me if I am mistaken but isn't age difference supposed to cover difference in rarity?

I mean a 2009 Rare is worth more for instance than a 2010 rare.

I don't know how much difference is needed between a rare and an UC, but at least I believe this was the general principle, was it not?

Not trying to defend any rule breaking but I am wondering about this myself. I do it sometimes that I offer pets almost a year older but say a Very Common for a Common and the person cancels saying it is unfair.

My gallery · by **Velveteen Unicorn** » Fri Jan 11, 2013 11:07 pm

I seem to be the magnet for new users who send ghastly trades asking for my highest pets for nothing... and when I try to send them a fair trade they always end up either 'yelling' or lecturing me on why their pets are worth more.... :roll: