Trade Rant Thread. {new rule please look}

[bast,]

how is this if you accepet i will take really good care of them

____________________ will give 24 pets for your 19 pets.

This already sounds bad.
Their trade?

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... PSSwMxZNlg

I highly hope they were joking. Even if they were new, I dont get their logic....

*Shudder* Thats not natural...

[Fionatje]

Not only do I receive this total unfair trade begging for pets and I already have all the pets they offer me, this Coppa has to send it to me twice
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... r_4n1buFmQ

[leverage]

how is this if you accepet i will take really good care of them

____________________ will give 24 pets for your 19 pets.

This already sounds bad.
Their trade?

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... PSSwMxZNlg

I highly hope they were joking. Even if they were new, I dont get their logic....

*Shudder* Thats not natural...

No...its not...

[flufferpie]

O_O

Besides the fact that this is asking for 13 pets that include rares and a very rare, this breaks quite a few of my rules and they are COPPA'd.

[saorsa-]

I Do NOT care if the pet is a re-release from '08. if it has the date with the magic numbers of 2010, it is worth a 2010 rare/very rare. IT IS A 2010 PET! RE-REALEASE OR NOT, I prefer ORIGINAL date pets, re-release aren't worth anything ascompared to original date pets..

I hate it when people say this. I don't know why, but it makes me not want to trade with them. Basically they are saying that a re-released sunback that might have been released in 2010 is not worth the ones released in '08.

[Mindfang]

I Do NOT care if the pet is a re-release from '08. if it has the date with the magic numbers of 2010, it is worth a 2010 rare/very rare. IT IS A 2010 PET! RE-REALEASE OR NOT, I prefer ORIGINAL date pets, re-release aren't worth anything ascompared to original date pets..

I hate it when people say this. I don't know why, but it makes me not want to trade with them. Basically they are saying that a re-released sunback that might have been released in 2010 is not worth the ones released in '08.

I have the same feelings towards that.

[leverage]

I Do NOT care if the pet is a re-release from '08. if it has the date with the magic numbers of 2010, it is worth a 2010 rare/very rare. IT IS A 2010 PET! RE-REALEASE OR NOT, I prefer ORIGINAL date pets, re-release aren't worth anything ascompared to original date pets..

I hate it when people say this. I don't know why, but it makes me not want to trade with them. Basically they are saying that a re-released sunback that might have been released in 2010 is not worth the ones released in '08.

I hate that. Or when people refuse to trade for re-releases. Ive seen that in peoples rules a few times. There was even someone who refused to accept a gift because it was re-released.

[ɾïṿεṉḋεll]

I Do NOT care if the pet is a re-release from '08. if it has the date with the magic numbers of 2010, it is worth a 2010 rare/very rare. IT IS A 2010 PET! RE-REALEASE OR NOT, I prefer ORIGINAL date pets, re-release aren't worth anything ascompared to original date pets..

I hate it when people say this. I don't know why, but it makes me not want to trade with them. Basically they are saying that a re-released sunback that might have been released in 2010 is not worth the ones released in '08.

I hate that. Or when people refuse to trade for re-releases. Ive seen that in peoples rules a few times. There was even someone who refused to accept a gift because it was re-released.

There isn't really a differance, same pet, same rarity, different 'birthday.'

[saorsa-]

Basically they are saying, if someone offers me a 2010 Dog Tag, I will only pay a 2010 very rare for it. =_= *makes me twitch*

[ツ Smile]

What? I'm confused... Arn't older pets worth more then newer ones? It's like how everyone wants pets adopted on the First rather then any other day of the month... I would agree with that person. I would prefer an older pet rather then re-realease