*DISCONTINUED* Rares List Guide (1 March 2019)

[The Last Raven]

I don’t have time to really go over the current suggestion and give a complete statement or my thoughts on cancelled trades but I wanted to mention that If we include canceled trades can we please have a clear grouping of them? Like a header that actually says canceled trades so that if I am going through the trades posted I don’t have to click through canceled trades to get to the accepted.

[Takk]

Currently I’ve separated them by value and in order by month and year (so far) so I canceled trade looks like this

Non value and Up
January ‘17
May ‘17 -Canceled (but with a link and stuff)
July ‘17

I’ve got a good draft right now if anyone wants to see and make suggestions. PM only tho, nothing public to minimize confusion and conserve space (to anybody! Don’t have to be a regular poster if you’re curious or whatevs) c:

[ElementalInsanity]

Considering the evidence in this post (link to post), what would be the best placement for the UR PEACH?
1. Non Tier (sufficient trade evidence)
2. UR Holly Tier (sufficient trade evidence)
3. A new tier between Non & UR Holly (middle ground between both tiers)
4. I don't know but voting is fun

Quoting this again, to try to get some more opinions about if people agree/disagree and why they do. =)

Is the wording alright? Should we edit it?
Is the explanations in parentheses alright? Should we add anything, or take it out altogether? Etc etc.

[EmberzTale]

Considering the evidence in this post (link to post), what would be the best placement for the UR PEACH?
1. Non Tier (sufficient trade evidence)
2. UR Holly Tier (sufficient trade evidence)
3. A new tier between Non & UR Holly (middle ground between both tiers)
4. I don't know but voting is fun

Quoting this again, to try to get some more opinions about if people agree/disagree and why they do. =)

Is the wording alright? Should we edit it?
Is the explanations in parentheses alright? Should we add anything, or take it out altogether? Etc etc.

I think we should just have the options with none of the additional information but have a page number in the title that users can check out for trade evidence.

[Sinbreaker]

Considering the evidence in this post (link to post), what would be the best placement for the UR PEACH?
1. Non Tier (sufficient trade evidence)
2. UR Holly Tier (sufficient trade evidence)
3. A new tier between Non & UR Holly (middle ground between both tiers)
4. I don't know but voting is fun

Quoting this again, to try to get some more opinions about if people agree/disagree and why they do. =)

Is the wording alright? Should we edit it?
Is the explanations in parentheses alright? Should we add anything, or take it out altogether? Etc etc.

I think we should just have the options with none of the additional information but have a page number in the title that users can check out for trade evidence.

I think we should put " (sufficient trade evidence on page ##)" on the post we include this on. To reinforce the idea of users to go check the trades themselves and make an opinion.
Also I think 4 should be simply "I don't know". The voting is fun part is a nice addition but we want this poll to be taken serious. And don't want users voting that option as a joke.

[ElementalInsanity]

I think we should just have the options with none of the additional information but have a page number in the title that users can check out for trade evidence.

I think we should put " (sufficient trade evidence on page ##)" on the post we include this on. To reinforce the idea of users to go check the trades themselves and make an opinion.
Also I think 4 should be simply "I don't know". The voting is fun part is a nice addition but we want this poll to be taken serious. And don't want users voting that option as a joke.

Ah I agree with you there, Sin, it would sound better with that taken off.
So you feel we should restate the fact of the trade evidence in the questions themselves along with the poll title? Just to clarify. =)

@emberz, I’ll be quoting the link to the post with the trades in it in the title itself, so that’ll be there. But can I ask why you feel we shouldn’t include the additional information?

[Sinbreaker]

I think we should just have the options with none of the additional information but have a page number in the title that users can check out for trade evidence.

I think we should put " (sufficient trade evidence on page ##)" on the post we include this on. To reinforce the idea of users to go check the trades themselves and make an opinion.
Also I think 4 should be simply "I don't know". The voting is fun part is a nice addition but we want this poll to be taken serious. And don't want users voting that option as a joke.

Ah I agree with you there, Sin, it would sound better with that taken off.
So you feel we should restate the fact of the trade evidence in the questions themselves along with the poll title? Just to clarify. =)

@emberz, I’ll be quoting the link to the post with the trades in it in the title itself, so that’ll be there. But can I ask why you feel we shouldn’t include the additional information?

Yes, I think restating it, while is redundant, may encourage people to check themselves and decide between the 4 options. Of course there is going to be people who don't check, but that can't be helped. Just have to hope that users see the number, the post, and the evidence and decided.

[ElementalInsanity]

Yes, I think restating it, while is redundant, may encourage people to check themselves and decide between the 4 options. Of course there is going to be people who don't check, but that can't be helped. Just have to hope that users see the number, the post, and the evidence and decided.

I definitely agree. I don’t feel there ever is such a thing redundancy in things like this. Repetition is what helps us remember, so I’ve heard lol. The more information and gentle reminders we have of everything for the poll the better.

[Cellar x Elijah]

I definitely like the idea if including the page number in each option like that. Imo, it helps reinforce that we do in fact have trade evidence for each option and where it can be found. The more we show the page number, the better chance that people will see it and actually go to look at it before voting, too. Obviously we can't force anyone to look at that page but it's more likely people will read the options they're voting for than the title or question anyway, if that makes sense.

~ElijahWilkes

[Erythro]

Since we can post links in polls, we could also have a link attached to the page number. Not only will it reinforce the idea to go look like Elijah said, but it will make it convenient too!