new thread!

My gallery · by **The-red-queen** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:49 am

Is this fair to me? I don't have double of the two big dragons, so I am very unsure if I want to trade those.

My gallery · by **planetpain** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:50 am

.Bambi. wrote:
Is this fair to me? I don't have double of the two big dragons, so I am very unsure if I want to trade those.

They are overtrading. Your pets are from 2015 and one of theirs is from 2012. The items i am unsure of though.

My gallery · by **Crystalwolf14** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 5:51 am

Adventuresmissingyou wrote:
.Bambi. wrote:
Is this fair to me? I don't have double of the two big dragons, so I am very unsure if I want to trade those.

They are overtrading. Your pets are from 2015 and one of theirs is from 2012. The items i am unsure of though.

I disagree, they're actually underpaying a little

My gallery · by **DepressedAnonymous** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:01 am

Crystalwolf14 wrote:
Adventuresmissingyou wrote:
.Bambi. wrote:
Is this fair to me? I don't have double of the two big dragons, so I am very unsure if I want to trade those.

They are overtrading. Your pets are from 2015 and one of theirs is from 2012. The items i am unsure of though.

I disagree, they're actually underpaying a little

Agreed, they need to add a bit

My gallery · by **dakotapaws** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:01 am

Does this look alright?

My gallery · by **pillow.** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:04 am

Wing's of Castiel wrote:
Does this look alright?

If you're into that MUCH of a trade down for your blue rose, then go for it. just be aware that you COULD GET more for it but as long as you're fine with it being off the list (as far as I can tell.)

I suggest you get a secondary opinion for the exact math of what their side equals to, though! x

My gallery · by **Takk** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:05 am

Wing's of Castiel wrote:
Does this look alright?

I counted about 54 '09 rares, the Blue Rose is worth 49 so they'd be slightly overpaying

My gallery · by **dakotapaws** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:08 am

Pillowfluff wrote:
Wing's of Castiel wrote:
Does this look alright?

If you're into that MUCH of a trade down for your blue rose, then go for it. just be aware that you COULD GET more for it but as long as you're fine with it being off the list (as far as I can tell.)

I suggest you get a secondary opinion for the exact math of what their side equals to, though! x

What do you mean by more?

Takk wrote:
Wing's of Castiel wrote:
Does this look alright?

I counted about 54 '09 rares, the Blue Rose is worth 49 so they'd be slightly overpaying

Thank you ^-^

My gallery · by **vhulpes** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:08 am

Any advice on the fairness of this offer? I was already told once on the old thread that it was unfair to me; just wanted a second opinion!

My gallery · by **The-red-queen** » Sat Jan 30, 2016 6:08 am

thanks everyone!

new thread!

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Re: The "Is This a Fair Trade?" Thread

Who is online