This is a work in progress <3
This is a spare post that will be kept here until a use for it comes up.
This is a spare post that will be kept here until a use for it comes up.
never wrote:so you’re stating that this list is going to be based off demand or what?
never wrote:Kittytalia wrote:
That's the plan. My goal is to get a generalization of both rarity and demand from people. So when you ask someone what a pet is worth, and they say "Well, it's worth this, but actually, it's worth this with demand..." I want to get that second part out there, since that is generally what they are treated as "actually" being worth.
demand is userbased, and in all honesty there isn’t really a “clear answer” on what something is worth in demand / personal value, because it varies from user to user.
DrMoneyBags wrote:Will you be placing Pets,like the dragoncat and Shima, which almost always trade for lists, on it?
And how will you tackle omgsr rats? They’re omgsr but rarely trade for even a sorb
Kittytalia wrote:DrMoneyBags wrote:Will you be placing Pets,like the dragoncat and Shima, which almost always trade for lists, on it?
And how will you tackle omgsr rats? They’re omgsr but rarely trade for even a sorb
Yes! The dragoncat and Shima will be placed right alongside the lists that they are of equal worth to, going by how many '09 rares they are worth compared with similarly valued lists. Certain non-lists from before will will be lists according to this one.
I am still considering how to do the rats. They are certainly not valued very high by most people, so there will likely be a poll to come later on, to get people's general opinion on whether they should be placed below, at or above a sorb's value. They should be placed around that area, but it depends on how the poll goes, and the opinions we see later c:
Users browsing this forum: _Aquamarine_, ChristainAnimalLover, cloudcuckoolander, Jennadey, Sploosh and 1 guest