Rare pets

[Angel with a Shotgun]

Lately I have seen some people with groups like: OMG so precious! Never ever for trade! My sweetie! etc. It's not fair to all of the pets to be locked up forever in those groups. The rares all need to move on. Otherwise, due to lack of those rare and adorable pets, the trading world would become boring. Customs for YOU are fine to stay, in my opinion. Just that all of the rares have been disappearing because of this. I have a do not touch group, but all of the pets will move on. This is my opinion on this.

[XanthussMarduk]

Lately I have seen some people with groups like: OMG so precious! Never ever for trade! My sweetie! etc. It's not fair to all of the pets to be locked up forever in those groups. The rares all need to move on. Otherwise, due to lack of those rare and adorable pets, the trading world would become boring. Customs for YOU are fine to stay, in my opinion. Just that all of the rares have been disappearing because of this. I have a do not touch group, but all of the pets will move on. This is my opinion on this.

its up to the pets owner to choose what they do with there pets plus new rares they don't like are always being made .
Also what do you think CS is for? its for collecting all the pets and keeping them all (not that you have to)

[nightbeat]

People just love their pets so much, and many people put their rares up for trade.

Would you want to trade a pet that you've wanted for a long time?

Sorry, but I don't think it's unfair. After a while, the pet's rarities WILL go up to rare/very rare.

[Kat]

People get attached to their pets. Its rather natural even though they're just pixels. I'm attached to some of my pets. I was recently offered an AMAZING deal for one of my moonswirls, one that would probably get me the rest of the pets on my wishlist easily but I declined because I'm attached to my swirls and will probably never trade them off.

[Shai]

I see nothing wrong with having groups that are not for trade. I have a few myself, and no, it is not unfair to do that. It seems to me to be more unfair people who have a 'Complete Collection', and not trading it.

[~Firewolf~]

Yes, some people really love their pets. I am attached to some of them, and probably wouldn't trade them for anything. We all get attached to some pets, and we do not want them to move on.

[Seasonal]

If you traded for a pet, it is yours. Therefore, you can do whatever you want with it. I don't think it's unfair at all; people worked hard for what they have. For example, I got my dream pet for free. It would be a bit rude to trade her, no? She is glued to my account, just like over 800 other pets are. There will be new Rares to collect and trade, so I see nothing wrong with keeping something that you want.

[Aura]

If you traded for a pet, it is yours. Therefore, you can do whatever you want with it. I don't think it's unfair at all; people worked hard for what they have. For example, I got my dream pet for free. It would be a bit rude to trade her, no? She is glued to my account, just like over 800 other pets are. There will be new Rares to collect and trade, so I see nothing wrong with keeping something that you want.

Took the words outta my mouth.
Yes, I understand the feeling when you just stare hungrily at someone else's rares that are not for trade, but it is up to them to trade that pet (i've been doing that so much lately it is not funny.)

[Khemo]

I prefer to not think of some of my favorite pets as being so dispensable. (Yes, I see this mindset that way.) Many of my favorites are rares because they're very pretty, and they won't be going anywhere. It's not unfair in the slightest that I want to keep what I worked for or received from generous people because other people don't have them and it gets difficult to find them. In my opinion, it would get boring if I only ended up trading every pet I have.