.......... oh yikes, the mini-CS site tag only differs from the C$ tag by 2 pixels (more if you count the surrounding white pixels, which you probably won't)
I'm super grateful that we have the tag at all now, but Libelle makes a good point
Libelle wrote:Shian wrote:Man.
Not sure what you are trying to tell me, I am not a man ...![]()
Shian wrote:Libelle wrote:It was probably well intended, but I do not find this update helpful. We have many pets tagged "CS" in black, in red & green, in grey, and in other colours. The "C$" tag is hardly distinguishable from these "CS" tags. Especially for new users who do not know what details to look for and, most importantly, for people with colour blindness (like myself) who read the green as grey. To me, the following tags looks exactly the same at first glance:![]()
![]()
I understand, this update is intended to help prevent users from accidentally trading away a store pet or from accidentally trading it away for underpay. If, however, I have to think about whether a pet might be a store pet and zoom in really closely to identfy the tag correctly or even check the archives to be on the safe side, I will not be in any danger of accidentally trading it away anyway.
Man.
Simon wrote:Not really seeing the issue here because for the store pets there will always be two tags (the normal one and the C$ one) so it should be pretty clear.
Simon wrote:Not really seeing the issue here because for the store pets there will always be two tags (the normal one and the C$ one) so it should be pretty clear.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests