odi wrote:
just for that, i'm going to say the more groups, the better... but i don't know how i like the titles. they make sense so far, don't get me wrong, it's just.. very long. maybe beside their titles could be a number?
OMGSC = 1
EC = 2
VC = 3
and so on...
so the rarity of a common pet would be listed as COMMON | 4 for example.
because i really don't feel like typing out all these acronyms every time i talk about trading. numbers would simplify it to be more palatable.
I really like this idea! Also a nice easy way to visualise.
Also like to add as some with ADHD and dyslexia a symbol for the verys (eg. triangle for both very common and very rare) would be incredibly difficult for me because to me the same symbol means the same (so I'd confuse very common and very rare pets as they would have the same symbol). Symbols are good but I think there needs to be a focus on differentiating between high and low, especially when you can already choose to display the text with the colour for rarity.
(I am about to go to bed sorry for poor grammer)