Your point is valid.. However.. I disagree. I cannot look at the pictures and convict someone years later. I guarantee you there is a whole backstory to this thing that we don't know. Tess and some others prolly know about it. I may see the weapon.. but the person is still innocent until proven guilty. I need all of the facts to convict her and that takes more than just the pictures. That would take talking to the person or people she allegedly copied from.. and that is not gonna happen.
^^^^And what is more important than that.. I was not asked to be on the jury. Tess asked our opinion regarding uniformity.. and cleaner lines... not whether or not we should make Equie dissappear.
^^^^^Again.. I repeat. there is nothing wrong with deciding yes because you think she traced them.... and there is noting wrong with voting yes just simply to protect CS's reputation and PREVENT any future issues.. but it is wrong to vote becuz you have "proof" and you know it all ... when you dont.
"
Whatever you do..don't become a judge, please.
So you're saying that there is obvious proof, but that doesn't matter at all?
Let's take that to the real world.
There is proof that a man killed someone. Obvious proof. However, you can't talk to him for some reason! Oh my, he must be innocent then! :O
How can you seriously ignore so much proof? I don't..i just don't get it.