We've updated our pet rarity measurements!

[swoomzie]

I'm just kind of mad that I have gotten cheated in some trades because some of the rarities "went down." But I guess that happened to everyone, so I guess I shouldn't complain.

I understand that feeling x3 I am happy but also sad at the same time so your on the same page as everyone else here. xD

[Loka]

Amazing Work :D I love the new rarity measurement ^_^

[rabbit...]

I will have to get used to the bar! But if a lot of pets are turning into commons trading would be easier!

[gemini_girl]

This is great! The only thing I did not like was re-sorting my trades Xp

[one single bee]

Personally I hate this change, so many unfair trades by some pets, oh boy, that's the life

Commons per Very Commons and OMG So commons, I hate the life!

[SydneyandStorm]

Personally I hate this change, so many unfair trades by some pets, oh boy, that's the life

Commons per Very Commons and OMG So commons, I hate the life!

Keep in mind that the pets' actual values haven't changed; the tags are just more accurate. The rarities are independent of the tags. The only thing rarity tags really do is give us an approximate idea of what they're worth. If you think a trade you sent was extremely unfair, check the dates and demand again. Trading includes both of those things, not just rarity. If you go by the tag alone, you'll end up with some very unfair trades anyway.

[one single bee]

Demand= High
Date= Current

That is the status of the pet and the other user pets are:

Demand= Dead
Date= 2011

Demand= Medium
Date= Current

The quality MATTERS me (OMG So commons or Very Commoms are not worth for a Common, its not a simple math operation), the quantity DON'T MATTER me, but some people don't think like me

[swoomzie]

Demand= High
Date= Current

That is the status of the pet and the other user pets are:

Demand= Dead
Date= 2011

Demand= Medium
Date= Current

The quality MATTERS me (OMG So commons or Very Commoms are not worth for a Common, its not a simple math operation), the quantity DON'T MATTER me, but some people don't think like me

I do x3 I have a good habit of Rares for rares and so on. Believe me I had some picky people in the past/

[SydneyandStorm]

Well that's understandable, but for the ideal fair trade, the demand and date should be evenly matched. One or two rare pets will go fairly for very rares, and some very rares wouldn't go for five other very rares. Point is, the rarity isn't a set value and demand and date should factor in as well. I'm not saying rarities don't matter and rarity math certainly is not acceptable but more than rarity is important to trades and rarity really shouldn't be the only thing you trade for. Either way, things are much fairer now in the system and I'm satisfied with the new rarities. I lost some rares but rares are now much more wanted and uncommons should be sought after too. Commons are as they should be: common. It just makes more sense this way and trades will get fairer soon once everyone gets adjusted to the new system.

[swoomzie]

Well that's understandable, but for the ideal fair trade, the demand and date should be evenly matched. One or two rare pets will go fairly for very rares, and some very rares wouldn't go for five other very rares. Point is, the rarity isn't a set value and demand and date should factor in as well. I'm not saying rarities don't matter and rarity math certainly is not acceptable but more than rarity is important to trades and rarity really shouldn't be the only thing you trade for. Either way, things are much fairer now in the system and I'm satisfied with the new rarities. I lost some rares but rares are now much more wanted and uncommons should be sought after too. Commons are as they should be: common. It just makes more sense this way and trades will get fairer soon once everyone gets adjusted to the new system.

x3 I have already adjusted to it x3 I am a lot happier now since everything as you said, has gotten fairer. Thanks CS!