The "Is this a fair trade?" thread -Rule Update-

[luca.]

Hi,
would you consider to accept a trade like this, thinking about the good quantity?
I'm pretty sure that the user could easily make it fairer to me, but it's a bid so I'll rate and see if he wants to add or not.
I'm just curios how you rate the fairness?

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... Rt4vMOUX5Q

[Tylerr Joseph]

XX How is this? It's a bid for my auction

[Snailsy]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... JFrZbtqDvQ

Is this trade fair? I know an aussie is above the gap on the list. But they're asking for my UR flower pot, AND my purple toxic

Thanks to anyone in advance ^^

[.crossfire.]

XX How is this? It's a bid for my auction

Not fair. Sorbet is on the main list and most of those pets are September or advent lists. Get another opinion

[Winterstore]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... OcUVCLYLoA

This trade for my store pet? I'm not great with uncommon rarities. Thanks for any help! (:

[hummxs]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... OcUVCLYLoA

This trade for my store pet? I'm not great with uncommon rarities. Thanks for any help! (:

Very unfair to you. Your store pet is worth an early '10 rare and their side doesn't add up to one.

[SpyroMello]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=62860969&userid=785706&signature=ztKQskOItgFLJFrZbtqDvQ

Is this trade fair? I know an aussie is above the gap on the list. But they're asking for my UR flower pot, AND my purple toxic

Thanks to anyone in advance ^^

Unfair to you since the aussie has bad demand and isn't worth ALL of the pets they asked for. They would need to add at least a high tiered advent or low tiered september to make up for the demand and value but I would ask for another opinion.

[Elettra]

XX How is this? It's a bid for my auction

Not fair. Sorbet is on the main list and most of those pets are September or advent lists. Get another opinion

Agred. The Sorbet is towards the middle of the Rares List, and is typically used a stepping stone for other pets (i.e. a non is worth 3 sorbets). The pets they've offered at about to a mid September List, and are nowhere near the worth of the Sorbet. ^^

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=62860969&userid=785706&signature=ztKQskOItgFLJFrZbtqDvQ

Is this trade fair? I know an aussie is above the gap on the list. But they're asking for my UR flower pot, AND my purple toxic

Thanks to anyone in advance ^^

Unfair to you since the aussie has bad demand and isn't worth ALL of the pets they asked for. They would need to add at least a high tiered advent or low tiered september to make up for the demand and value but I would ask for another opinion.

I have to disagree. I think that it is unfair to the UR Aussie. Rarity wise, the UR Aussie is worth 1 non + a sorbet, but it can get a non even with its meh demand. ^^ I was able to trade mine for a non + a skele PPS + an advent lion. The UR Flower pot has poor demand, and typically only goes for a sorbet. Even with the added store pets, it is still unfair to the Aussie side demand wise.

[LostInTheEcho]

Is this trade fair? Thank you
Edit: This?
And this one? [2]

Which of these three is the fairest?

The third trade by far is the most fair trade, the other two don't even include a list pet. Some of the items in the trade are quite old also. In C$ the flowers is worth around 1015C$ but like some of the Urs has bad demand so it usually goes for a sorbet worth which is around 765 C$ altogether their side would add up to approximately 550C$. So is unfair to you, but if they added 200 more C$ it would be perfectly fair:)

Thank you
May I have a second opinion?

[purble]

http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 8EfColIpWQ

Is this fair? Also does the flower pot have a high demand?
Thanks c: