musicgurl333 wrote:Not sure on the second one, but the first one seems unfair to you. I agree that older staff pets do tend to have a bit higher demand than average, although the '13 lion on their side has demand as well (not sure about the '14 PPS lion). But even without taking demand into account, I don't think it's fair to you. It might be close to fair if you use the "3 year rule" for everything (but a lot of people don't use that for old pets, myself included), but it's VERY unfair if you use the "2:1 rule" (which I personally don't recommend, but many people still use it to some degree).
The store pet is worth about 1 old rare. In my opinion, the rest of their side doesn't add up to two more '10 rares and 7 '11 EUCs, and I definitely wouldn't accept. If you're interested in the store pet, I might edit to just that and one of your '10 rares.
Thanks for the response! They ended up auto-cancelling due to trading something away, but I'll probably go back to them with a new offer to try to snag the things I was most interested in. Thanks for confirming that the old staff pets have some demand attached to them, it's hard to find info on specific staff sets sometimes.
Still have
this trade that I'd appreciate thoughts on if anyone has any opinions!
Their
UR foal for my
angry basilisk, rerelease hollyfox cat, TD santa rat and rerelease light pawprint rat as well as a couple older items. I am in the process of trying to trade up to a UR kirin, so this would skip me up Horror's list pretty well, but I've also seen discussion that the foal doesn't trade well...
My side is 8-9 MA, not including the items, while their side is 9-10MA. Strictly by the numbers it seems fair, but I'm not sure beyond that.