POLL 1 ----- Thread beginning to mid-Aug 2022 ------- wrote:"Do you support the idea of the thread's rarity list?"
Yes because I want a rarity list to trade by that makes sense
Yes because I just miss the rares list
I support the idea, but maybe a different execution of it
No
I’m not sure / I just want to voteTotal votes : 1616
1037 [64%]
134 [8%]
114 [7%]
159 [10%]
172 [11%]
POLL 2 ----- Mid-Aug 2022 - Mid-Sept 2023 ------- wrote:"If they're all from the same year, How many Uncommons = a Rare pet to you?"
5 or more Uncommons = Rare
4 Uncommons = Rare
3 Uncommons = Rare
2 Uncommons = Rare
I use 2:1 for old pets, but More for recent pets
I use 4:1 for old pets, but Less for recent pets
It just depends on demand, I'll expect/pay more for a good rare and less for a bad one
I just use whatever the person I'm trading uses
A different method not listed here
I’m not sure / I just want to voteTotal votes : 2248
146 [6%]
273 [12%]
257 [11%]
630 [28%]
72 [3%]
88 [4%]
494 [22%]
57 [3%]
20 [1%]
211 [9%]
MINI POLL 1 ----- Sept 16-17 2023 ------- wrote:"(Only applies to pets above the non tier) Combine the top rarest OMGSRs into 1 Tier or 2 Tiers?"
1 Tier. I think with the new update it matters less what they were 5 or more years ago, and they're still the rarest anyways
2 Tiers, I don't think all of those pets belong together even with the new changes and still need some division
Total votes : 126
42 [33%]
84 [67%]
MINI POLL 2 ----- Sept 18-19 2023 ------- wrote:"What should we do with the last "list" pets that DIDN'T go OMGSR?"
Make them one large group of High Extremely Rares. I think they're all close enough to be together now/think one group will make trading less strict
Merge them into two small groups. I think they should still have a bit of separation, even with the big rarity update
Total votes : 96
61 [64%]
35 [36%]
Wookieinmashoo wrote:I chose 5:1 for the old poll, and other for this one as I've changed it a bit. I do 5:1 from current year to 2014. for 2013 in can be 4/5:1 and reduce it for older years from there. I don't actually trade uncommons for rares, but animal eggs instead so my experience may be skewed because of people's dislike for items in general.
I don't think 2:1 for uncommons is reasonable unless for older years simply because of the ratios we have been given. They're old, but it's at least something to go off of even after the shuffling of the rarities.
musicgurl333 wrote:I kind of wish that “it depends” hadn’t been included as an option. I feel like it doesn’t really give much information, and it’s drawing votes away from the other categories. I mean, to me it seems obvious that of course it depends. I think nearly everyone could honestly put that as an answer. I almost did myself, until I considered that if everyone did that, then the poll wouldn’t really paint a very clear picture of how many uncommons people trade in general for rares.
Users browsing this forum: Nhotemau, Scarlet Janefox and 6 guests