Rate the Pokemon

[snoobiies]

♡ I never thought it was that interesting, though it is quite cute. It's not very powerful and has no cool evolutions, so I overlooked it for a long time. However, the fact that it won Worlds in 2014 is HILARIOUS. That gives it a few points for me. 6/10. ♡



♡ Pheromosa? ♡

[Obsessed]

4/10 i almost exclusively use glass cannons, but not this one. there are fighting types with better stats and move pool and i've never really been a fan of training bug types with the intent of actually using them and not just pampering them. i love the antennae but not the human similarity on an insectoid pokemon. something about it looks just a smidge too off for me.

Hatterene?

[Guest]

3/10 eh.. i don't really like hatterene
it just looks a little funny to me

hisuian growlithe?

[nyanyan.com]

4/10 looks emo.

shiny audino?

[snowdrake]

6/10
I honestly prefer the regular version, but there's certainly worse shinies out there!

charmeleon?

[Feral Fangs]

7/10
Only because it's not Charizard, Charizard is one of my favorite fire type Pokémon

Ursaluna?

[neocritical]

8/10
I prefer other pokemons.
Phanpy?

[snoobiies]

♡ It doesn't really do anything for me. I feel pretty neutral on it, although this face that it makes is quite funny. 5/10 ♡



♡ Pincurchin? ♡

[science rules]

4/10 Meh never really cared for it. Its design is kinda silly

Chansey?

[saw]

10/10 one of my favs!
raichu?