Nice updates! Havent read all yet but skipped to the rarity ones :P i hope its oke i add some pointers?
For example, "very rare" store pets are often considered to be worth less in trades than "very rare" free pets. And "common" pets which were adopted 6 months ago are often considered to be worth more than "common" pets adopted this month.
Popular species (such as dogs) tend to be worth more in trades than less popular species (such as rats).
Look a little off to me. Store pets are considered to be worth more then anything very rare release around their release date but that sentence suggests they are not? They typically go for rares but from older years, those being close to the 'very rare tag' Maybe that sentence can be tweaked somehow?
As for the popular sentence, i feel like cs as a site should not play into demand and label pets as worth less like this, because now new people will automatically value rats less 'because the FAQ says so'. Not all rats have that horrible demand and there has been a steady uprise in people who prefer, hoard and collect the rats ever year. Its never been hard to trade rats for their full value for me. I hope rewording that sentence will be reconsidered c:
The most common pets on the site are usually the least valuable and it is hard to find someone to accept them in trades, because most people already have the same common pets. But the rarest pets on the site are extremely valuable and people may trade dozens or hundreds of pets to get just one OMG so rare pet.
If a pet is common, its usually not hard to trade it, especially not to hoarders. So that might also need to be tweaked a bit as to me it suggests that these pets are 'dirt' common and you cant trade em cause nobosy wants em. Which usually is the opposite imo?
Edit: thats all ive got, the rest looks superb! Thanks to every staff member who put the effort in, im assuming it was a team effort :D it looks fab and im sure itll help out lots of members, old and new alike!