Avisowl wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=66755634&userid=881201&signature=rTi3gZI14UmmAqEiNxGWog
Is this fair and what should I edit about it
Could I have any second opinions just to make sure please, maybe more information?
This is unfair to you. By value alone, a late '09 rare=two late '10 rares. The commons and uncommons add up to a '10 common plus a '12 common, so I personally would ignore them here as they don't really make much of a difference. So to fill the age gap, they need another late '10 rare