Shian wrote:ElementalInsanity wrote:I think having a separate color of rarity complicates it more, whereas a tag is pretty simple. ^^
Hmm....
On one hand the PPS and BBS tags do get in the way of some dressups. Throwing a tag on it could do the same thing in a minor fashion.
From a coding/setup stand point, I'd think making a new rarity would be faster to set up than open your art program and paste the new tag on every single store pet. (especially if you lost the originals of an older one, oops?)
Different rarity tags would help too but I'm honestly 100% for either solution.
Speaking of rarity, do you want to trade? They're both rare. My rare for your rare. It's totally a fair trade and they're both the same lineart



Mine's even a little older so it's totally good deal! Ehhh? Ehhhhhhh?
Yeah, I'll see myself out thanks XD
Huh, that's a good point. For some reason I forgot that adding a tag to the store pet images would require manually doing so haha
Maybe I'll figure out how to word the non-image-based solution and then put that into the first post as a potential solution (but I won't edit the poll since I don't want to risk resetting the votes after so long)
Also, that pet comparison is my favorite so far as I think that is very, VERY likely to actually happen. We've had quite a few store pets go rare; I think fewer and fewer users (other than new users) are surprised when popular store pets start out rare instead of very rare.
Here's a mistake that I
actually made (posted a while back in this thread) (thankfully, no harm came of it; first link = they were the one who initiated the offer, second link = me sending the trade back asking if the user was sure they didn't want to add more on my side because their side had store pet
s, but they accepted anyway despite my message):
Here are some of their littermates that I was thinking of when I first saw their trade:



All available during August 2014. All with unknown rarity tags at the time of the trade.