Should there be a pet limit?

[. C a i l a .]

NO THERE SHOUD NOT BE ONE! BECAUSE IT IS UNFAIR U MIGHT GET EVERY PET THAT U ADOPTED THE SAME! ALL COMMONS OR ALL UNCOMMONS THEY MIGHT LOOK THE SAME TOO!

[tuna]

If there's not a pet limit, why should there be rarities?

THINK. You wouldn't have to trade for things...

[. C a i l a .]

If there's not a pet limit, why should there be rarities?

THINK. You wouldn't have to trade for things...

No because u can get them all the same pet same color same everything for all the pets that u getlol its true

[Prowe44]

I don't think it's going to change just because of what you get It seems very unfair to people who worked hard to find uncommon outcomes. It would throw everything around CS off quite a bit. There would be no challenge, and we need a challenge since this site doesn't give you much to do.

[sundayrain26]

I'm thinking this is a rather spam-y topic... I doubt the adopting system will change. It's been like this for quite a while and works just fine. Having to trade for some outcomes is all part of the challenge.

[Hekomi]

There used to not be a pet limit, but one was implemented because what fun is it if the game is not challenging. I doubt it will be removed anytime soon.