Bella Werecat wrote:We believe marriage is between a man and a woman.
We oppose sex out of wedlock as well. Sorry for the confusion.
So then how can you say that love is love and people are people? By your conditions homosexuals are alowed to hang out and maaaaybe hold hands, but they can't consumate their love or attraction. It should be love is love [if it's conventional heterosexual love] and people are people [provided one of those is a biological male and the other is a biological female]. That statement should be said with no strings attached, not with hidden conditions built in by religions following old population growth laws (you do take stuff from the Torah and Christian Bible, yes? Is Mormonism as continuation like Islam is?).
I don't think any religions endorse sex out of wedlock, so you're [arguably :D] in good company there.
Has any genetic research shown that the Native Americans have any link to biblical Israelites? I personally don't have to worry about sending DNA to any mitochondrial family mapping, because I know that I fit very snugly in the Ashkenazi Jew line, but far as I know the Native Americans do not display micochondrial DNA similarities to people from the biblical Middle East, which would discount the theory that they are a lost tribe.