Animal Debate

Share your real pet photos and stories, tell us about your fav species, promote wildlife causes, or discuss animal welfare

Re: Animal Debate

Postby not zinnia » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:46 pm

NotMe wrote: [...]
What if...
The animal abuser did not know it was wrong? I'd like to point out a medical diesease which means people do not have feelings such as empathy and sympathy, and do not understand the concept of those.


Interesting point you've got there. Sociopaths are very hard to detect under normal conditions. Also, they will never see their actions as inappropriate [how ever inappropriate they actually are], therefore giving them no reason to see what they're doing is wrong. But someone would be able to find out eventually if they were doing some crazy experiments with their pets.

@Yes Man:
Even if someone had a mental issue that didn't allow them to know sympathy and empathy doesn't mean they don't understand the concept of consiquence. If creatures react negatively to what they are doing, they would be aware they were doing something "bad".

Therein lies the problem -- Sociopaths don't have that type of connection. They do see the suffering and the consequences. That doesn't mean they feel the consequences.

If there was a person... oh say, with schizophrenia, and one of their auditory hallucinations told them to choke their pet, they most certainly would. But that person will have other people around them 24/7 ensuring they don't do anything to harm themselves or others, including pets if need be.

I doubt anyone living alone with a government-verified mental condition is even allowed to own a pet, so I'd say that's just a dead end.
//Sorry, I'm such a psychological nerd. x3
Image
“Love does not make me gentle or kind.” —Anne Carson, Autobiography of Red

Art ShopTH
User avatar
not zinnia
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:59 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby Wishful Thinking. » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:48 pm

NightFlame22 wrote:About the 'putting humans in the wild w/o technology'
Well, the Natives did it, didn't they? No technology whatsoever. So I think our generation actually has a good chance of survival in the wild, given that we know more about nature than our ancestors.


Not true at all and I am part Native American! Our ancestors know way more about this earth and survival then we ever could!!
User avatar
Wishful Thinking.
 
Posts: 7708
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:04 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby NightFlame22 » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:50 pm

LoveWolves815 wrote:
NightFlame22 wrote:About the 'putting humans in the wild w/o technology'
Well, the Natives did it, didn't they? No technology whatsoever. So I think our generation actually has a good chance of survival in the wild, given that we know more about nature than our ancestors.


Not true at all and I am part Native American! Our ancestors know way more about this earth and survival then we ever could!!

I meant scientifically.
I know what you mean, things should've stayed simple like that. I'm part NA too. :3
┌─────────┐

































└─────────┘
Image
Image
Image
Image
╔═════════════════════════╗


x
Hiya! The name's NightFlame, but most call me Night or Flame.
I'm just an exciteable person who loves art and dragons!
Feel free to PM me if you need anything at all <3



╚═════════════════════════╝
Image











Image
User avatar
NightFlame22
 
Posts: 23752
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:42 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby van » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:51 pm

LoveWolves815 wrote:
NightFlame22 wrote:About the 'putting humans in the wild w/o technology'
Well, the Natives did it, didn't they? No technology whatsoever. So I think our generation actually has a good chance of survival in the wild, given that we know more about nature than our ancestors.


Not true at all and I am part Native American! Our ancestors know way more about this earth and survival then we ever could!!

As time goes on, we learn more. The native Americans were in the past and we have learned about them and learned from their mistakes, so yes, we know more than them. We may not be accustomed to said actions we know of, but we know more.
User avatar
van
 
Posts: 10473
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 9:42 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby maetropa » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:51 pm

☽strix☾ wrote:
NotMe wrote: [...]
What if...
The animal abuser did not know it was wrong? I'd like to point out a medical diesease which means people do not have feelings such as empathy and sympathy, and do not understand the concept of those.


Interesting point you've got there. Sociopaths are very hard to detect under normal conditions. Also, they will never see their actions as inappropriate [how ever inappropriate they actually are], therefore giving them no reason to see what they're doing is wrong. But someone would be able to find out eventually if they were doing some crazy experiments with their pets.

@Yes Man:
Even if someone had a mental issue that didn't allow them to know sympathy and empathy doesn't mean they don't understand the concept of consiquence. If creatures react negatively to what they are doing, they would be aware they were doing something "bad".

Therein lies the problem -- Sociopaths don't have that type of connection. They do see the suffering and the consequences. That doesn't mean they feel the consequences.

If there was a person... oh say, with schizophrenia, and one of their auditory hallucinations told them to choke their pet, they most certainly would. But that person will have other people around them 24/7 ensuring they don't do anything to harm themselves or others, including pets if need be.

I doubt anyone living alone with a government-verified mental condition is even allowed to own a pet, so I'd say that's just a dead end.
//Sorry, I'm such a psychological nerd. x3

I laff you xD
I'm interested in psychology as well, genetics

Ahem, anyway
This is a good points and stuff c:
User avatar
maetropa
 
Posts: 5158
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 7:00 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby 4kcuo » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:51 pm

NightFlame22 wrote:
LoveWolves815 wrote:
NightFlame22 wrote:About the 'putting humans in the wild w/o technology'
Well, the Natives did it, didn't they? No technology whatsoever. So I think our generation actually has a good chance of survival in the wild, given that we know more about nature than our ancestors.


Not true at all and I am part Native American! Our ancestors know way more about this earth and survival then we ever could!!

I meant scientifically.
I know what you mean, things should've stayed simple like that. I'm part NA too. :3


We'd be better off as NAs, when you think about it. Much more healthier.
with school in full swing i'm likely going to be mobile-only except on weekends, sorry guys!!

Image



Image

[ da ] [ tumblr ] [ toyhou.se ]
you can call me cuo if you'd like!
i love to draw!! & i adore art trades! hmu
User avatar
4kcuo
 
Posts: 11773
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 2:53 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby NightFlame22 » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:55 pm

@ Arachnid
So true, so true. It'd not only be better for humans, but for the environment as well. We wouldn't have to worry about pollution or maybe even animal abuse. Strong beliefs in animal spirits. :D
┌─────────┐

































└─────────┘
Image
Image
Image
Image
╔═════════════════════════╗


x
Hiya! The name's NightFlame, but most call me Night or Flame.
I'm just an exciteable person who loves art and dragons!
Feel free to PM me if you need anything at all <3



╚═════════════════════════╝
Image











Image
User avatar
NightFlame22
 
Posts: 23752
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2011 1:42 am
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby Wishful Thinking. » Mon Jan 02, 2012 5:57 pm

NightFlame22 wrote:
LoveWolves815 wrote:
NightFlame22 wrote:About the 'putting humans in the wild w/o technology'
Well, the Natives did it, didn't they? No technology whatsoever. So I think our generation actually has a good chance of survival in the wild, given that we know more about nature than our ancestors.


Not true at all and I am part Native American! Our ancestors know way more about this earth and survival then we ever could!!

I meant scientifically.
I know what you mean, things should've stayed simple like that. I'm part NA too. :3


Yes, things should have always stayed that simple! Their population was fine and they keep balance with the other life around them. As us now and days, we humans are less healthy, more lazy and I say if you put someone who as always lived with things being given to them, and never spend much time outside in the wild, I'd find it amusing and they won't have not even the slightest chance of survival as our ancestors did.
User avatar
Wishful Thinking.
 
Posts: 7708
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:04 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby Wishful Thinking. » Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:00 pm

NightFlame22 wrote:@ Arachnid
So true, so true. It'd not only be better for humans, but for the environment as well. We wouldn't have to worry about pollution or maybe even animal abuse. Strong beliefs in animal spirits. :D


True!! I also strongly believe in animal spirit guides!
User avatar
Wishful Thinking.
 
Posts: 7708
Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2011 12:04 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Re: Animal Debate

Postby not zinnia » Mon Jan 02, 2012 6:00 pm

NotMe wrote:I laff you xD
I'm interested in psychology as well, genetics

Ahem, anyway
This is a good points and stuff c:


Heheh <33 ;D
I have no idea what to say so...
Ahem. You've made some very good points yourself.
//I'm awkward~

So yeah.
@Native American Convo: OhgodOhgodOhgod, I don't want to start trouble or anything, but Native Americans got their butts handed to them once the colonists came over due to guns and superior intelligence. The NA's weren't technologically advanced, therefore couldn't survive in today's world by any standards.
Would you rather be living under the rule of some other, stronger country... or be free Americans? ;-;
My point is, if it weren't for the way history went down, you wouldn't be able to enjoy the luxury of a simplistic life such as that.
Image
“Love does not make me gentle or kind.” —Anne Carson, Autobiography of Red

Art ShopTH
User avatar
not zinnia
 
Posts: 2299
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 2:59 pm
My pets
My items
My wishlist
My gallery
My scenes
My dressups
Trade with me

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest