Dog-Trainer wrote:wolfgirl2011 wrote:Oh my gosh guys! Stop attacking one person who's posting-which is called bullying-
.just for people to argue now and not nicely brag about their dogs.
NOPet hate alert. This is NOT bullying. AT ALL. No. It's arguing. Just leave it, they have, stop making false accusations. Bullying is not to be taken lightly, or as a joke. Don't use it in this context. Please. No.
However I do
kind of agree with '' just for people to argue now and not nicely brag about their dogs.''. Kind of.
Now, lets all agree this is over and done with, and we can now all get back to photobombing the thread and general chit chat c:
I do agree we should move on, I do. I've said several times we should (and then I manage to get myself thrown back in. Ah.) anywho, I would like to just make one more post, one more so hopefully you guys can try to understand our point of view.
I'm coming out quite what has been being said behind closed doors.
For example, me and Fuzzy are both arguing with you guys. First, it (most of the time) is a matter of opinion; there is no right or wrong, and if you think there is... You need to lighten up. Because honestly, there is always wrong in everything you will find, and there is always right in whatever you will find. That's just humanity. There can not be a right or wrong.
From our point of view, it looks to us as though you are trying to get us to believe in your ways, which we don't want to and that needs to be respected. You can disagree with us, but you can also acknowledge that we aren't entirely wrong, we aren't horrible people.
Another view point from us, is you don't seem to be understanding the real context of what we are trying to say (or at least what I'm trying to say).
We've tried explaining over and over that we DO agree with most of what you are saying, we are fighting for someone else, but you ignore that, or at least you don't acknowledge it in your posts.
For example, I was discussing with my boyfriend about the kill shelters, and he tried disagreeing with me, saying that they are needed, which I then proceeded to tell him I VERY WELL KNOW AND UNDERSTAND THAT and that has nothing to do with what I am arguing. What my argument is, is that it is wrong to kill an animal and it's innocent life, it didn't ask to be put out on the streets, it wasn't born just to die. THAT is my argument, that it is wrong.
Please try to understand that.
Now, this is going to be on a little big of the more... Targeting approach of things, but there isn't any way else to put it.
People have been PMing me and Fuzzy (I won't say who) and telling us they agree with whatever it is we are saying, but they don't want to say anything because they are too scared of being pushed around by the older members of this tag.
We get it, you're dog experts. We do agree with what you say most of the time, and you have great advice. But you need to understand we are entitled to our own opinions, you cannot change the past, we aren't ever implying things, our dogs are doing just fine without all the tests and papers and whatnot, let's leave it at that.
Who CARES where people got their dogs from? In the end, they are all just the same species, the same dog. No more breed discrimination, no more "my dog is better than yours because they were health tested and from a good breeder" no more "my dog is better than yours because they aren't aggressive" no more. No. More.