|Winter| wrote:I'm really struggling with the fact that you're basically implying here that domestic animals live better lives than wild animals. If you're talking about dogs or cats, sure. If you're talking about basically any other animal that we've domesticated, absolutely not. Again, it comes down to the majority. It's estimated that there are around 500-900 million dogs in the world, of those, only about 25% actually live in homes, the rest are street dogs. Compare this to the 10 billion animals who die every single year in factory farms alone. Yes, I'm bringing up factory farms again because even though everyone here says they don't like them, most still continue to support them anyway. Meat = factory farms. There's no way to get around it unless you spend lots of money to buy from a local farm or raise your own animals.
Cruelty is inherent to the wild, but it is not inherent to captivity. Yes, people buy meat from factory farms and I believe that should change. Because I support animal welfare. When I say that domestic animals are lucky, I am referring to some pets and local farms (honestly most pets aren't taken great care of either) because middle earth was arguing against humane local farms as well. But yes most people in the US buy cheap meat from factory farms, just like most people buy cheap produce harvested from slave labor in poorer countries. This is a deeper issue that goes beyond animal rights and animal welfare. Smaller farms are forced to up their prices and struggle to make a living. People aren't paid enough and people are exploited. Most of us are practically forced to support animal abuse and human exploitation. This isn't just an animal welfare or rights issue, it is also a human rights issue.
And I do plan to raise animals and support local farms when I am better off.
The amount of dogs in the world is another big welfare issue, agreed. I believe proper and enforced regulation should be put in place for breeders to help reduce the population of dogs and cats, as well as efforts to remove strays off the street. Because I support animal welfare.
|Winter| wrote:When I say I support animal rights, I don't say the right to live because that is way too vague. I want and fight for the same rights that other animals such as dogs and cats receive. If a dog is abused, starved, or kept in unfit conditions, then they are taken from the home and the owner is fined. We understand as a society that it is wrong and immoral to mistreat an animal. I think most of this comes from the fact that a lot of us see and interact with dogs or cats on a daily basis. However, the only interaction most people have with cows, pigs, and chickens is when they are sitting on a plate in front of us. So thinking of them as anything other than a meal is considered radical. I want people to recognize that when it comes to feeling pain, loss, happiness, and anything else, that farmed animals are no different than the pets we keep in our homes and to treat them as anything less is just not right.
I'm a bit confused, because this sounds like you support animal welfare. I agree with this. Farm animals deserve to be cared for just like cats and dogs. The animal welfare vs. animal rights terms are similar to the "pro-life" vs. "pro-choice" terms. Someone who is pro-choice isn't anti-life, someone who is pro-life isn't necessarily anti-choice. People who support animal rights would support the welfare of animals. Someone who supports animal welfare supports some "rights" for animals as well. One can argue that the "5 freedoms" are rights for animals. But its more than that. The terms refer to more complex ideologies.
Unless you are making the point that we don't eat cats and dogs, and therefore we shouldn't eat livestock either. However, I'm totally down to eat some humanely raised dog or cat.
Also, as for natives, the Inuits, Yupik, and Sami peoples rely heavily on meat, especially during the harsh winters.