Ralonica wrote:]And with Frodo - he may sound very quiet, weak and sad, but he was carrying the burden of the ring. He has to be given some credit for it... he suffered so much over the whole story, it's amazing he held up for all of it.
THIS. I very much agree! I haven't read the books in a while (they're somewhere at my parents' house) but in the movies at least they are clear to say multiple times that Frodo has surprised them with his strength, his resistance to the ring, especially as a hobbit. No one could have gone through such an ordeal - not only carrying the ring, but coming from such a small community and being thrust into the harsh wide world, injured by ringwraith, attacked by Shelob, taken by orcs, learning about and traveling with Gollum, who also bore the ring for a long time, etc - and come out unchanged. He knew he had changed far too much, that the childish gleam was gone from his eyes. He'd seen far too much to remain with the hobbits thereafter. He was wisened and aged and weary and disillusioned with the world; he could just go back to naive Shire and pretend it had all never happened (especially how in the movies his home was unchanged, that very much disappointed me).
I used to feel more like you guys, praising Sam rather than Frodo, but I later saw that both were to be commended. Frodo got SO much farther than anyone expected, but in the end of course he couldn't have done without Sam always being there along the way.
I'm excited to see Martin Freeman's Bilbo. xD I think he's quite right for the role. :3