polerberr wrote:I can't speak for the movie since I have't watched it yet.
As a European, though, I really don't understand the mindset behind violence being less bad than nudity. Is it really so damaging to expose a child to a naked person in the context of watching a movie? I mean they're going to be seeing plenty of it when their adults anyway. Probably. I know that you can say the same thing about violence, but the one big important difference is that nudity (on its own) doesn't harm other people, whereas violence is pretty much the definition of harming other people. Sorry to be using this film as an example of everything time and time again, but I've actually read accounts of people saying that when they were children their parents made them watch Schindler's List. Their parents skipped over the short sexual scene in the movie, but made their children watch scenes where Jews were shot at concentration camps, which affected them when they were kids in a pretty negative way. Honestly I would find those scenes more traumatizing as a child than seeing some breasts and Liam Neeson's butt. Oh no, boobs, oh the horror.
OH MY GOD! RUN! FEMALE BREASTS THAT FEED BABIES! OH NO! BUTTS! WE ALL HAVE ONE AND WE HAVE ALL SEEN OUR OWN! HORRIBLE RUN RUN RUN RUN!
-sorry
















