COMMUNITY POLL: Rare Monthly Pets

[ShadowKatto]

Oh no, yeah you're right, I was not actually making a poll with votes that would determine anything! And I have no intention of staff using my hypothetical "poll" in any capacity. I was just making light of the situation ^^; that there is no turning around this train, so to speak.

The train of what?

[Pallastronomy]

I have a gut feeling that when they inevitably go through with this based on poll results (and presumably do a test run next month) there’s going to be a massive shift in people’s stances once they’ve seen it in action, whether it be for or against
Unfortunately as somebody who’s vehemently against this I really don’t think things are going to be in our favour until we have physical evidence of how bad of an idea it is in practice

[LadyoftheGeneral]

I have to admit that I find it confusing that rares are…more common now? I know the rarities changed, but I would have thought that rarity has to do with how many of this pet are in circulation on the site. However, it almost seems arbitrary sometimes as to what makes a rare and what makes an omgsc, particularly when they showed the new graph regarding the new rares system. A couple of the comments on this thread have specifically listed rares as being “more common” now which baffles me. Can someone explain how that works?

I’m absolutely for getting rares in standard litters, I’d personally like to see at least one a month that’s harder to get than the others outside of events! That actually sounds awesome and frankly was how I thought these things worked to begin with.

[Nicnova]

Oh no, yeah you're right, I was not actually making a poll with votes that would determine anything! And I have no intention of staff using my hypothetical "poll" in any capacity. I was just making light of the situation ^^; that there is no turning around this train, so to speak.

I think a new poll would be beneficial though! Although I support the idea, I think that a new poll should definitely be made with full details if staff decides to implement it. There's lots of factors that I, and I think a lot of people, would consider important to know before making a choice.

For example- a set standard on how rare the pets will be. I am happy with rare/very rare monthly pets but I think ER+ is too far for an initial release. I would not vote for ER+.

So once a detailed plan is laid out, we should definitely have a new and more specific poll.

[Sashtato]

I have to admit that I find it confusing that rares are…more common now? I know the rarities changed, but I would have thought that rarity has to do with how many of this pet are in circulation on the site. However, it almost seems arbitrary sometimes as to what makes a rare and what makes an omgsc, particularly when they showed the new graph regarding the new rares system. A couple of the comments on this thread have specifically listed rares as being “more common” now which baffles me. Can someone explain how that works?

I’m absolutely for getting rares in standard litters, I’d personally like to see at least one a month that’s harder to get than the others outside of events! That actually sounds awesome and frankly was how I thought these things worked to begin with.

There are number of pet designs, and number of pets per design. So there are a lot of pet designs that are rare, but fewer of each design (which is what makes them rare). It seems like there are less vc and below because there are fewer designs that are so heavily distributed if that makes sense?

It’s like this:

There are ten of each of these: 🌼🌸🌺 (Because there are ten of each, each design is common)

And there are two of each of these: 🌲🌿🌱🌴🌳☘️🍀 (because there are two of each, each design is rare)

There are more green designs but fewer of each, and few flower designs but more of each!

So there are more rare designs but fewer of each pet if that makes sense!:)

[Mellowmarsh]

I think that a rare pet every few months would be a really cool idea, but if it's on a monthly basis or even a few rare pets per batch i think it would make collecting the whole litter so much harder, especially for people who have problems interacting with others.

[Mari123]

I would love to see rare pets each month!

[ShadowKatto]

I would love to see rare pets each month!

Same!

[TheOakWoods]

i can’t help but notice that a lot of the hype train for this is players who have only been around for less than a year, and are excited to have more to trade. i think that you guys are being too optimistic.
yes, it will be great if you can get a rare, and it will help you trade for the pets you really want. but that’s also what events are for. in the long run, this will really just be an annoyance for the majority of the player base who don’t manage to get one but can’t complete their collection without overpaying. ESPECIALLY for new players who don’t have anything to pay.
i do think the idea of less rare zebra-type-pets would be nice, as long as they’re “optional” for a complete collection like the zebras.

[heepheep]

honestly whenever there's a special outcome I forgo any attempt at trading for it because people ask for insane overpays. I can do this bc i'm not a collection completionist and I don't mind if my monthly pets look patchy but for people who are I imagine this would be a huge pain haha. I admit it would make the lull when there are no events more interesting. a chance to strike gold when picking up monthlies sounds fun