Fat Unicorn wrote:lil rascal wrote:Fat Unicorn wrote:Unfair to you. D;
Recent store pets (Oct - Jan '12) will only be worth 09 uncommons from now on in.
No offense intended but whoever came up with that is dreaming, very few people who spend real money on store pets would trade them for an 09 uncommon unless we are talking highly desirable hard to find uncommons like the longtail staff dog, people will just stop buying them for trade. Look at it this way, the recent store pets are worth 20C$, and an 09 rare advent is worth 20-25C$, a fair trade
Not really. Next year, the Store Pets will be worth 2010 Rares. (Early).
You can't just expect this month's Store Pets to go for a Jan 09 Rare, can you? the 09 Rares are worth MORE now, than they would be earlier in the year, simply because they are older. :3
I'm aware people buy the pets with real money, but you can't expect for the next couple or so years for the S Pets to continously go for 2009 Rares. Is that what you were suggesting? ouo
So despite the store pets being worth 20C$ you would suggest that a trade for pets valued equally at 20C$ is not fair and people should instead accept pets valued at 10-15C$ for them? I'm not sure where the Jan 09 Rare came from since I was using the example of an 09 advent rare, 09 rares are not all the same worth, just as 09 uncommons are not all the same worth, I am simply suggesting people start trading for equal C$ value, sure some 09 uncommons might be worth 20C$, but certainly not all, or even most, whereas a lot of late 09 rares or uncommons newly turned rare are.
The store pets can not be devalued until the other pets C$ values go up or people will just stop buying extra for trade, which would cause cash flow problems for CS.
