Harlequin Raven wrote:Wow...I just got a trade with three uncommons for my rare. I have "rares for rares only" twice in my rules, bolded! Now people just not reading the rules at allvi am used to, but this person at least read my trade suggestions (which also have the rares for rares rule), as they made mention of the fact that I value dogs over ponies. If they got that little, less important snippet that is not even a hard and fast rule, how did they misss the rares for rares rule?
You put this:
Rares for rares only unless they are the same value (i.e. a 2011 rare may be worth a 2009 uncommon).
I checked and 3 uncommons that I wanted to trade to you, were worth that pet? they were all 3 '09 uncommons for 1 '09 rare? I asked 3 people, all of them said it was fair. I also said I could add more if you like.
Sorry just wanted to point that out.
Anyway my rant:
People still asking me for my locked group...