golden wolf wrote:Fail to the user !!!!!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... VWuQYyU0DQ
...lolwut?
What's so bad about that trade?
~Sorrel
golden wolf wrote:Fail to the user !!!!!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... VWuQYyU0DQ








golden wolf wrote:Fail to the user !!!!!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... VWuQYyU0DQ

Kalika Kai wrote:golden wolf wrote:Fail to the user !!!!!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... VWuQYyU0DQUnless they were doing a date swap?

golden wolf wrote:Kalika Kai wrote:golden wolf wrote:Fail to the user !!!!!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... VWuQYyU0DQUnless they were doing a date swap?
Umm..
Were there Easter dog re-releases ?
golden wolf wrote:Kalika Kai wrote:golden wolf wrote:Fail to the user !!!!!
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... VWuQYyU0DQUnless they were doing a date swap?
Umm..
Were there Easter dog re-releases ?
Satamoru wrote:Probably wanted an ID swap ;3 So that all their easter dogs were in the same area of the group
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)


.png)
.png)
.png)



.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)
.png)













emmaiskewl wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/viewpet.php?id=665812
Is this alright for that pet? I can add!^^
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... EWTpVSU2aQ
First off the pet is in a locked group, so NO!
As I was writing this and about to cancel they cancelled (because they are adding more pets) and are resending it -.- This is just not my day! D:
13 of your pets that I don't even want for 15 of mine from the same year?
Yeah no; not fair. Same year trades are usually same rarity=same rarity. I don't need to pay 15 pets to get 13 I already have and don't want from the same year...
Just because you think you're over offering doesn't mean you'll get the pet you want.
ESPECIALLY when you offer a pet that the person specifically told you they already have and don't want. >.>
Okay, okay, I didn't realize that when someone has a pet in their TRADE groups that's barely worth anything on their wishlist that accepting a trade that was offering a pet worth MORE was a bad idea.
Apparently I don't know anything though. Now I know why I don't trade, because people have this lovely habit of getting grumpy over almost nothing.
I really don't actually see why you PMed me anyway.

Kalika Kai wrote:"Would you consider this to be a fair trade?"
Oh yes, my fifteen 2011 pets for your thirteen 2011 pets. Oh that is so fair. ;-; [/endsarcasum]
None of those pets are my hoards; so I don't really want them; not to mention I, personally, value cats more than dogs because I like the cats more. And there's no way I'm going to overpay for pets that are just going to end up in my trades. ;-;
So I canceled with this message:13 of your pets that I don't even want for 15 of mine from the same year?
Yeah no; not fair. Same year trades are usually same rarity=same rarity. I don't need to pay 15 pets to get 13 I already have and don't want from the same year...
Might be a bit bad, but I had just gotten another annoying trade and I was a bit miffed.
"Might you be willing to do this as a trade then? I'm sorry about the trade earlier, generally people value dogs more than cats so I figured it should stack up as fair. But hopefully you'll class this as fair? The dog I'm offering is 4 months older and the same rarity..."
I just told you I don't want that dog; so WHY are you offering it to me again??
And I don't care if it's 4months older; I don't WANT it. >.>
So I canceled, told them that, and they send me this trade: "This then? I didn't realize that even if I made an over offer you wouldn't accept." and they cancel it before I could accept it.
I send them this PM:Just because you think you're over offering doesn't mean you'll get the pet you want.
ESPECIALLY when you offer a pet that the person specifically told you they already have and don't want. >.>
I didn't think I was being that rude; but then they go and send me this PM back:Okay, okay, I didn't realize that when someone has a pet in their TRADE groups that's barely worth anything on their wishlist that accepting a trade that was offering a pet worth MORE was a bad idea.
Apparently I don't know anything though. Now I know why I don't trade, because people have this lovely habit of getting grumpy over almost nothing.
I really don't actually see why you PMed me anyway.
I PMed them to let them know that "overpaying" with a pet that someone's already told you that they DON'T want isn't going to get you the pet that YOU want. *Grumbles*
People like this are why I don't want to trade. ;-;
And they're from October 2009
Users browsing this forum: Corey Taylor, Google [Bot] and 1 guest