And a second one....
Kecko wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=7567400&userid=37720&signature=yPACAW_-8HAGT3djP26pmQ
Was this fair? It was cancelled but I thought it was fair

HeartOnHoliday wrote:
1.) Unfair to you; two 11' uncommons would be fair.
2.) 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 % Unfair to you
~ t r o u b l e ~ wrote:Kecko wrote:http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=7567400&userid=37720&signature=yPACAW_-8HAGT3djP26pmQ
Was this fair? It was cancelled but I thought it was fair
quite unfair to them. Rainbow drafts are not sought after. they are concidered "worthless" rares, and its hard to get two uncommon 09s for them. most people pay for them as if they were uncommon 2010 horses. by labled rarity, its fair. but by what they are actually are its unfair.
HeartOnHoliday wrote:HeartOnHoliday wrote:
1.) Unfair to you; two 11' uncommons would be fair.
2.) 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 % Unfair to you
Mysticwave wrote:Would the pets in This group be fair for a pink grinner?
~Amberleaf~ wrote:This? ;o
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... PmHK4KMZtw\
And these two. ^.^;
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... mBv5owH15A
The person is willing to give up one of those two pets. Which one would be fairer? If both are horrendously unfair, then to which side?
http://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/v ... 4PUKUM0ZGw
I'm also rather interested in this one. ^.^;

Users browsing this forum: boomboxed, Delta Dawn, Goku-san, LunaLate, nemohappyturtlepants and 2 guests