RaptorWasHere wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=108500907&userid=1048629&signature=JZ9o0-oPlvi1lHoMjgAkGw
Is this fair?
Technically very unfair to them, if you go by year.
A 2017 very common would be worth 12 very commons from 2023 if you use the 2:1 rule.
However, considering these pets are relatively common, and quantity between more common pets gets ridiculous very fast:
I'd say adding 2 more 2023 very commons would make it look a little bit better.























