samiam52900 wrote:Was this fair? I have been told multiple time that the 2:1 ratio for year and omgsc-uc and then a uncommon = a rare 2 years younger? thoughts?
No definitely not, you'd need at least an uncommon added onto that common. If not a bit more. very unfair to them. As rares tend to be valued more over commons. By the rule- yes you're correct. By usual trade values. No. Plus space pets (rares) tend to be overpaid for.
Edit: Realized I needed to explain more whoopsies

















