gay wrote:Wookieinmashoo wrote:I wasn't talking about free costumes though. It's obvious free costumes would be more common because they're free. My point was that people do not often adopt, I forgot to specify, token costumes. People are likely to spend tokens on plushies though. It's them being costumes, and ones that fit one species or unpopular species, that cause them to not be adopted as much. I'm sorry if there was a misunderstanding.
Was there a discussion on the bunny suits? I'd really like to be able to see it if possible?
I see, I understand your point now. There was discussion on the older suits, but since the more recent ones were placed much lower, I didn't see the point in having a discussion when I wouldn't even be giving it a solid value and would be tacking it onto the "no data" list. The people who I usually discuss things over with before assigning values have all retroactively agreed with me, however, though in the future I'd understand if you'd like us to be more transparent about things.
I think that's one of the biggest issue I have here, lack of transparency. If these discussions are had on the forums, then more input can be had. Discussion is not trade evidence, but it can further prove or disprove and account. The more people involved, the better. If people knew what items were being discussed, they could put the item on their wishlist and go out and look for them. And even if some people have gotten hostile over discussing items, I will still read their input because it still matters. I just wish some people would be more calm and not overly defensive when questions are asked. I feel it's really putting people off in discussing things altogether.
