The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[Vaal Hazak]

thank youu!
this one too!

first trade: hmm. 1436 c$ is more than 0.5n (= 1.1k-1.2k), but not enough for 0.75n
it looks quite fair if you prefer the high amount of c$, as it can be seen as 7.5 ma and + 1 ma is the lower end of 0.75n

second trade: your side adds up to 23.5 '09 rares which is a little bit less than 3 ma (= 24 '09 rares)
the rat goes for 0.25n or 3-4 mas, so you'd need to add another '10 rare (or, as it's just slight overpay, take it)
however, the overall demand of rats is not the best and they are only tradable with a lot of patience-.

[fishmilk]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

[isl]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998909&userid=837254&signature=oRMZyNlHYReSKPGKw89Qzw

??

[Vaal Hazak]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

unfair to them.
if you use the 3-month rule you are offering a mid 09 vr for 2 early 09 rares
not to mention that Nick horses usually don't have very good demand and the Aussies are highly sought

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998909&userid=837254&signature=oRMZyNlHYReSKPGKw89Qzw

??

looks slightly unfair to you
the ur purple goes for 0.5n, their side adds up to 0.5 ma more than the higher end of 0.25n (4.5 ma)
honestly, considering the Tess horse is quite rarer (in rarity) than any of the pets offered on, I wouldn't lowballing it to 0.25n, even when people try to justify that with the demand.

[Osborn]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

Factoring in demand, the dogs on their side tend to have a lot of demand and can get slightly more than their worth which is the 3 month rule. These dogs can usually get more than the 3 month rule. Your side would be considered semi-fair if you didn't factor in the demand of their two dogs. I don't believe the Nick horse has any significant demand or value so this is overall unfair to them, ignoring the items which don't really affect the value of the trade.

[isl]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

unfair to them.
if you use the 3-month rule you are offering a mid 09 vr for 2 early 09 rares
not to mention that Nick horses usually don't have very good demand and the Aussies are highly sought

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998909&userid=837254&signature=oRMZyNlHYReSKPGKw89Qzw

??

looks slightly unfair to you
the ur purple goes for 0.5n, their side adds up to 0.5 ma more than the higher end of 0.25n (4.5 ma)
honestly, considering the Tess horse is quite rarer (in rarity) than any of the pets offered on, I wouldn't lowballing it to 0.25n, even when people try to justify that with the demand.

thank you! what would they need to add to make it fair?

[fishmilk]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

Factoring in demand, the dogs on their side tend to have a lot of demand and can get slightly more than their worth which is the 3 month rule. These dogs can usually get more than the 3 month rule. Your side would be considered semi-fair if you didn't factor in the demand of their two dogs. I don't believe the Nick horse has any significant demand or value so this is overall unfair to them, ignoring the items which don't really affect the value of the trade.

ty ! would it be fair to do one of the dogs for the vr ? or would i add something instead of one of them ?

[Guest]

this?

bumping as the trade partner

unfair to the Shima's side.
both the Shima and the Cheshire go for 2 ma each, so every other pet is not necessary.

Cheshire Cat is 2-3 ma. their side is just over 2 (shima is valued at 2 ma) however you could possibly push for 3 since the Cheshire Cat is quite sought after

i was told the cheshire was 2-2.5 MA

the only cases I saw the Cheshire getting 3 ma was when rats were offered
but in this case the demand of the pets is equal, because the Shima is just as high in demand as the Cheshire

(this screenshot is so big, im sorry)

godking, in the past you've said that cheshire most commonly gets 2-3 ma and now you seem to be changing what you've said. its difficult to say what cheshire is really worth as looking at the successful trades thread, it has been valued at 2 ma and even up to .25n numerous times. its really up to how the person with Cheshire values it, as in the end is it a unique looking store pet. a 2020 rerelease looks nowhere near appealing as the Cheshire (in my opinion)

[Geckos_N_Tea]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=95998868&userid=818213&signature=qeTk2dIBKnzKKlK6oiV-Jw

is this fairrr ?

Factoring in demand, the dogs on their side tend to have a lot of demand and can get slightly more than their worth which is the 3 month rule. These dogs can usually get more than the 3 month rule. Your side would be considered semi-fair if you didn't factor in the demand of their two dogs. I don't believe the Nick horse has any significant demand or value so this is overall unfair to them, ignoring the items which don't really affect the value of the trade.

ty ! would it be fair to do one of the dogs for the vr ? or would i add something instead of one of them ?

i personally wouldn’t value them that high, although i do know that demand for them is quite high. imo one of the dogs plus a ‘10 rare would be fair

[fishmilk]

would it be fair to do

(VR 2009)

for the 2009 nick horse ?? ahhh brain go brrrr