There’s 9 2016 commons, 5 2015 commons, 9 2014 commons, 7 2013 uncommons, 7 2013 uncommons, 7 2012 uncommons, 6 2011 uncommons
Some people use the 2:1 rule (2 uncommons = rare from that year) but personally I use the 5:1 rule (5 uncommons = rare From that year)
Actual math stuff:
9 2016 commons = 4.5 uncommons 2016 —> 2.25 2015 uncommons + 5 2015 commons (2.5 uncommons) = 4.75 2015 uncommons —> 2.5 2014 uncommons (rounding up) + 9 2014 commons (4.5 2014 uncommons) = 7 2014 uncommons —> 3.5 2013 uncommons + 7 2013 uncommons = 10.5 2013 uncommons —> 5.25 2012 uncommons + 7 12uncommons = 12.25 2012 uncommons —> 6.25 (rounding up) 2011 uncommons + 6 2011 uncommons =
12.25 2011 uncommons
Your side is worth 12.25 2011 uncommons (excluding 2009 staff pet)
Which would go down to 6.25 2010 —> or 3 2009 uncommons if you use the 2:1 rule this is fair to both side, if you use any other rule, this is unfair to them
Staff pets tend to go for overpay, I just can’t apply demand in this situation as I don’t know how to
I think this is a good deal if you’re looking to trade up though!
ruinandash wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=93193167&userid=984382&signature=H7y5e3Tva7HWpiXYoR8yOg
how's this?
1 2015 rare would be worth 2.5 2014 uncommons —> 1.25 2013 uncommons
So this trade is unfair to you, it only would be fair for 1 of your staff pets
(I am using the 5:1 rule, ex: 5 uncommons = 1 rare from the same year)