The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[FOUND VERDICT]

Which one is better?

1

2

3

4

Please respond ASAP, I don't want to keep anyone waiting. Thank you!

beg + pink balloon is the best, with the beg trading for around 1-1.25 nons and the pink balloon being worth an sorbet
the aussie + yellow sorb add up to 1.5 nons so close in value too.

[re4]

Which one is better?

1

2

3

4

Please respond ASAP, I don't want to keep anyone waiting. Thank you!

beg + pink balloon is the best, with the beg trading for around 1-1.25 nons and the pink balloon being worth an sorbet
the aussie + yellow sorb add up to 1.5 nons so close in value too.

Oh, okay. What about the other 2?

Also, second opinion?

[glowinghowever]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=90057951&userid=933140&signature=ZA4Ab83pLpMJUXKp5olgHw
Is this fair, I know nothing about how Chicken Dollars apply to rarities/dates.

Please help

[re4]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=90057951&userid=933140&signature=ZA4Ab83pLpMJUXKp5olgHw
Is this fair, I know nothing about how Chicken Dollars apply to rarities/dates.

Please help

I'd say they're overtrading, your pet is from 2009, making it worth around 35-55C$

So they should be overtrading by about 70 - 90 C$ depending on how you value the pet.

You can see more on the How much is this pet worth in C$ thread.

Please feel free to get a second opinion though.

[nowafflecone]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=90069187&userid=729447&signature=1sqMyOJgGxQIsp8czS2gFA

how is this? this is for an auction for the foal

[chromatica]

is this fair?

[re4]

Which one is better?

1

2

3

4

Please respond ASAP, I don't want to keep anyone waiting. Thank you!

Looking for a second opinion <3

[Draconica2014]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=90045021&userid=878037&signature=G7UlNdhDpKIEXe3fZZpJeQ
2nd op?

[Pastelaj]

Opinions on this?

[Horror]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=90039112&userid=878037&signature=3TSEuyozad7RU3hTkRpVOw
trades/viewtrade.php?id=90045021&userid=878037&signature=G7UlNdhDpKIEXe3fZZpJeQ

1. their side = 3 09 rares since the 2015 store is worth one and the horse is from 09 sept
your side = valuing the 08 rare at an 09 rare + 09 uc, thats 3 09 rares + a 2010 rare (+ the 2012 and 2016 rares)
small bit of overpay on your side

2. their side = 2 2012 items, 1 c$ store item (around 4.75-7c$ since it can be bought alone or in a set), and the rest are probably recent enough to somewhat overlook for the most part. other than the store one many items are typically a common/uc of their year as far as i know

id get a second opinion on this one though depending on how the items are valued it may not be that drastically unfair to either side

Opinions on this?

your side = a 2010 uc + 2011 uc total
this would be unfair to them