♡ Willow ♡ wrote:Catdoof wrote:Little unsure on this one - wanted another opinion
trades/viewtrade.php?id=89729458&userid=652185&signature=sFfWMStDr-GZNE5Eri7xXQ
OOf your overpaying by a lot. 4 2020 rares would be worth 2 2019 rares, or 1 2018 rare, OR a 2020 storept possibly depending on how much you value each 2020 rare (I personally value 1 2020 rare at 3 c$)
I do agree that going by the rule where pet values double yearly, their side equals an ‘18 rare, and you would be overpaying. However, I personally don’t think it seems like a completely unreasonable trade. You could probably add another ‘20 rare or two to their side, but realistically I doubt you’d be able to get much more than that.
I do disagree that 4 ‘20 rares equals a store pet. Valuing a ‘20 rare at 3C$ each, 4 would only be 12C$. Even if you get the set discount a store pet is about 15C$, which would be 5 ‘20 rares. To get to the full 20C$ value you’d need 7 ‘20 rares. Though I think you’d have a hard time finding someone to trade one for that.
VNKP wrote:Help with this?
Thank you!
trades/viewtrade.php?id=89716644&userid=985924&signature=U6JBBWyvQxE_qDDHVbllkA
It looks a little unfair to you, depending on how you value rares to uncommons, as well as the gap between years. Personally, I valued each rare on your side as 2 ‘19 uncommons, and I valued 2 ‘20 uncommons as 1 ‘19 uncommon. I also valued an uncommon as 3 commons. (Hopefully that’s not too confusing.)
Doing it that way, I got about 11 ‘19 uncommons worth on your side, and about 8 1/2 on their side. Also worth noting, event pets tend to have slightly higher demand.
