Is this fair or can I get more for it
trades/viewtrade.php?id=85977848&userid=902320&signature=wnggbJZPcRSA_yRwcGTR_A

EditPink wrote:Is this fair or can I get more for it
trades/viewtrade.php?id=85977848&userid=902320&signature=wnggbJZPcRSA_yRwcGTR_A
herb wrote:ratonhnhaké:ton wrote:ratonhnhaké:ton wrote:is this group fair for a bottom tier ex-advent list pet? is it worth 2 of them? (the only "valuable" pets are on the last page, the rest are assorted 2014-2020 omgsc-uc)
Rarity wise, probably. Demand wise, not really. Rarity-wise, there's only 3 2011 rares (a 2011 rare short of being worth just one 09 rare.) A low advent is worth at the least 3-4 09 rares. There's 67 uncommons, 256 commons, 141 very commons and 10 OMGSCs. So, most of the pets are common, 53%, so over half.
Demand wise, although it's good quantity, not many people would trade their lists down for mainly uncommons and below, especially since only 14% of the pets are uncommon, the rest are common and below. It would be hard to find someone to take this trade, but it's doable if you work hard enough.

Jeepher97 wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=85976922&userid=970874&signature=pezGYjWBLVw_4jtlyP3oAA
Is this fair?

LizardsAreLovely wrote:Jeepher97 wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=85976922&userid=970874&signature=pezGYjWBLVw_4jtlyP3oAA
Is this fair?
The CEG tends to go for about a non to 1.5 nons. (rarity wise it is worth less than that but demand is a powerful thing) It depends on what the user values the CEG at but if it's a non then it's fair. If it's 1.5 nons than it's underpay.
luisa wrote:









Users browsing this forum: _Umi_, EnochianGhost, InfernalHound, lil rascal, salmonpuncher420, SolarSonnet and 1 guest