"Is this a fair trade?" Thread [Updated Dec 2019]

[<InsertName>]

May I have some help with this? This is the second purple toxic trade I've gotten, I'm not really looking for them but perhaps would like to know how fair this is?

trades/viewtrade.php?id=86334278&userid=674735&signature=ZgUyPqLXqLCnMv1T4teAXw

It's fair, since as far as we can tell the toxics are all worth roughly the same as a sorbet dog and the purple/blues seem to manage to hit that sort of value, but you're probably better sticking with your yellow sorbet if you're not specifically interested in the purple toxic.

Alrighty, thank you very much!

[Ande.]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=86342243&userid=511437&signature=tAZv-u9f8G4Z8A7K-zVLawhow does this look ?

[✧*vintage.smiles*✧]

Thank you[/quote][/quote]
Can somebody PLEAS tell me how many c$ need to be added to make this fair? It will be almost a month since I first ask, and I still didn't get any answers beside "it's not fair". I have this trade for month now, and I'm feeling a little stupid.... I have ask in item topic, c$ topic, and sill didn't get anser... If somebody know where else I can ask to get answer it will be appreciated. Thank you.[/quote][/quote]

this stuff is around 2011-2019 so id say they could add anywhere between 10-15 C$ since all these pets are worth there date uncommon. [ my opinion, feel free to get another ]

[✧*vintage.smiles*✧]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=86342243&userid=511437&signature=tAZv-u9f8G4Z8A7K-zVLawhow does this look ?

unfair to the cat.

[♥HazelNightmare]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=86342243&userid=511437&signature=tAZv-u9f8G4Z8A7K-zVLawhow does this look ?

unfair to the cat.

Why would you say it’s unfair? Rarity wise it’s perfectly fair they are both from May 2009 very rare . Demand and if you value true dates over non true dates is subjective

[✧*vintage.smiles*✧]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=86342243&userid=511437&signature=tAZv-u9f8G4Z8A7K-zVLawhow does this look ?

unfair to the cat.

Why would you say it’s unfair? Rarity wise it’s perfectly fair they are both from May 2009 very rare . Demand and if you value true dates over non true dates is subjective .

demand wise the cat could get WAY more, as its a storepet, plus its just a really sought after pet. im just telling them they could get something better, id advise them to hold onto it. [ also on the first page it says every response is a opinion, so im allowed to give my opinion, arent i? ]

[reze]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=86342243&userid=511437&signature=tAZv-u9f8G4Z8A7K-zVLawhow does this look ?

unfair to the cat.

Why would you say it’s unfair? Rarity wise it’s perfectly fair they are both from May 2009 very rare . Demand and if you value true dates over non true dates is subjective .

demand wise the cat could get WAY more, as its a storepet, plus its just a really sought after pet. im just telling them they could get something better, id advise them to hold onto it.

please do not give wrong advice - that cat is not a store pet! adding onto this, it’s always good to say why a trade is unfair instead of just saying “unfair”, especially in demand trades. rarity-wise it’s completely fair whereas demand is subjective and although i agree that the cat can go for a lot of overpay, it’s still probably better to mention and explain that it’s due to demand and that it’s subjective and completely up to the trading partners.

[♥HazelNightmare]

The Malk Elementals are not store pets. Just saying it is unfair is not helping the person asking. You can explain why you may personally feel it’s unfair. Rarity wise though it is fair

[✧*vintage.smiles*✧]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=86342243&userid=511437&signature=tAZv-u9f8G4Z8A7K-zVLawhow does this look ?

unfair to the cat.[


Why would you say it’s unfair? Rarity wise it’s perfectly fair they are both from May 2009 very rare . Demand and if you value true dates over non true dates is subjective .

demand wise the cat could get WAY more, as its a storepet, plus its just a really sought after pet. im just telling them they could get something better, id advise them to hold onto it.

please do not give wrong advice - that cat is not a store pet! adding onto this, it’s always good to say why a trade is unfair instead of just saying “unfair”, especially in demand trades. rarity-wise it’s completely fair whereas demand is subjective and although i agree that the cat can go for a lot of overpay, it’s still probably better to mention and explain that it’s due to demand and that it’s subjective and completely up to the trading partners.

opinion. this is why i never give opinions on here, legit everytime people start something.

[amaoretto]

i have a vague idea of what everything on their side is worth but any extra help would be amazing
xxxxx