Hargrove's lil Rat wrote:Okay, they wanted to tell me it's unfair to them
I thought it is fair.
(considering the age gap of 2016 - 2020)
thanks you for any help.
if you go by the 2;1 rule and are particularly pedantic, you're over by a '16 OMGSC. if both those ratters turn out to be uncommon, you're under by an OMGSC. Either way, considering dreadful demand for rats i'd say the potential OMGSC shortage is pretty negligible.
if you're part of the "new" movement that doesn't consider dates to be as important, you'd most likely be under, since the rats will probably be common, but most people (here, at least) still use rarity maths.
