[NEW!!!] "Is this a fair trade?" Thread [READ RULES]

[Spine]

How does this look?

I'd say it's under. the moonswirl is worth 3 nons and the foal is only 1.5, and the rest does not make up for the rest

[phxyvi]

I just got offered this and it's completely caught me by surprise, but is it worth accepting??

YES! Take it! This is extreme overpay on their side

I wouldn’t say their trade is “extreme” over pay, but it’s definitely unfair to them rarity wise. However, I think demand wise the toxic has a higher demand. It took me forever to trade off my Nick unicorn since they in general have low demand.

Do not give out false advice

Although the nick unicorn has low demand, I think it’s ridiculous to drop its value to that of a toxic. It is an omgsr and on the main list. I would never value it below a non.

The toxic has mediocre demand as well. Most people are neutral on it.

I would inform the nick they’re overtrading, and remember to not try and demand push too hard. It’s important but to devalue the pet to that degree isn’t okay???

I just got offered this and it's completely caught me by surprise, but is it worth accepting??

toxic are worth 0.25 of a non (at least that's what i've been told) and the nick unicorn is worth a non, honestly i'd take it.

Thank you! I'd like at least one more opinion before I decide what to do though!

And you, the purple toxic is placed above a sorb on the list. I’m not sure if it still goes for around that value but given the blue toxic still falls around a sorb, I would assume the purple (having been put above it) would follow suit as well.

I wouldn’t say their trade is “extreme” over pay, but it’s definitely unfair to them rarity wise. However, I think demand wise the toxic has a higher demand. It took me forever to trade off my Nick unicorn since they in general have low demand.

So..maybe I shouldn't do it?

Regardless of the demand, the nick is considerably more valuable than the toxic and even with its poor demand you’d get more out of it.

That being said, though, I’d make sure the nick is informed and not trading away something worth, ballpark twice your pet out of sheer desperation or perhaps not knowing.

[powpowx]

Hello! Is this fair for my chesire cat? <3

I believe it is unfair to you by ALOT. Thats a 2012 vr for a 2018 vr, an entire 6 year difference but get a second opinion!

Do not give false info. That bunny is a rerelease. I'm unsure of the worth but i am aware that this above statement is not true

Thank you for your input, you all <3 may I get another opinion, please?

[phxyvi]

Hello! Is this fair for my chesire cat? <3

I believe it is unfair to you by ALOT. Thats a 2012 vr for a 2018 vr, an entire 6 year difference but get a second opinion!
Do not give false info. That bunny is a rerelease. I'm unsure of the worth but i am aware that this above statement is not true

Thank you for your input, you all <3 may I get another opinion, please?

It’s a t6 bunny? I’m not sure what Cheshires go for, or really much about low lists at all (only ever owned big lists honestly. Sorb and above, usually a non or more)

But I can recognize the bmd bun

[♥Princess of Lions♥]

How is this trade? I'm not sure what the pink sorbet is going for atm. Thank you so much to anyone who helps me out!! :)

[phxyvi]

How is this trade? I'm not sure what the pink sorbet is going for atm. Thank you so much to anyone who helps me out!! :)

Eh. Sorb is 1 non, Disregarding everything else they’re asorb short. If you think you can catch a sorb from the c$ and low lists then it’s fair, or if you want to value the dragon at 1 non they’re over (though imo it’s a solid 1.5)

[amarok.]

I just got offered this and it's completely caught me by surprise, but is it worth accepting??

YES! Take it! This is extreme overpay on their side

I wouldn’t say their trade is “extreme” over pay, but it’s definitely unfair to them rarity wise. However, I think demand wise the toxic has a higher demand. It took me forever to trade off my Nick unicorn since they in general have low demand.

Do not give out false advice

Although the nick unicorn has low demand, I think it’s ridiculous to drop its value to that of a toxic. It is an omgsr and on the main list. I would never value it below a non.

The toxic has mediocre demand as well. Most people are neutral on it.

I would inform the nick they’re overtrading, and remember to not try and demand push too hard. It’s important but to devalue the pet to that degree isn’t okay???

toxic are worth 0.25 of a non (at least that's what i've been told) and the nick unicorn is worth a non, honestly i'd take it.

Thank you! I'd like at least one more opinion before I decide what to do though!

And you, the purple toxic is placed above a sorb on the list. I’m not sure if it still goes for around that value but given the blue toxic still falls around a sorb, I would assume the purple (having been put above it) would follow suit as well.

I wouldn’t say their trade is “extreme” over pay, but it’s definitely unfair to them rarity wise. However, I think demand wise the toxic has a higher demand. It took me forever to trade off my Nick unicorn since they in general have low demand.

So..maybe I shouldn't do it?

Regardless of the demand, the nick is considerably more valuable than the toxic and even with its poor demand you’d get more out of it.

That being said, though, I’d make sure the nick is informed and not trading away something worth, ballpark twice your pet out of sheer desperation or perhaps not knowing.

seconded. it's hard to gauge the exact worth of the unickorn in relation to other pets considering how inaccurate the list ended up being rarity wise, but not counting store pets it's very likely the third rarest pet on the site, after the plains and grevy's stripy bois. even with it's poor demand it consistently fetches twice what the purple toxic would at best. more if you're one of those who values a non at three sorbets. i'd definitely recommend you pm the person with the nick and let them know precisely how much they're overtrading by.

[Bleek]

Would this be fair?

[phxyvi]

Would this be fair?

Just the 2010 and 2011s are fair
That particular Lineart catches overpay occasionally but certainly not another couple rares worth. I’d take off your 2015 and maybe leave the commons if you want the piggy

[amarok.]

Hello! Is this fair for my chesire cat? <3

I believe it is unfair to you by ALOT. Thats a 2012 vr for a 2018 vr, an entire 6 year difference but get a second opinion!
Do not give false info. That bunny is a rerelease. I'm unsure of the worth but i am aware that this above statement is not true

Thank you for your input, you all <3 may I get another opinion, please?

It’s a t6 bunny? I’m not sure what Cheshires go for, or really much about low lists at all (only ever owned big lists honestly. Sorb and above, usually a non or more)

But I can recognize the bmd bun

the cheshire cat's demand value varies pretty wildly depending on who you ask. a lot of people value it at its old list placement of a low advent, others will quote anything from a mid advent to a high september. the bunbun has a much more stable value but there's a good chance you could end up with a better bang for your buck with the cheshire if you're willing to hunt around, especially with the store pet craze of the moment. i'd have the cheshire, personally, but demand wise it's arguably pretty fair and is up to you.