Redpanda wrote:JJdiner wrote:
their side is barely worth a non
I know ^^ ty, second opinions on if i should accept?
Personally, I absolutely wouldn't. Even if bulk does have value of its own, you're taking a major hit in value there.
Redpanda wrote:JJdiner wrote:
their side is barely worth a non
I know ^^ ty, second opinions on if i should accept?
DrMoneyBags wrote:
I’d take the bengal or the CEG. The CEG I’ve noticed has some really weird demand with some people so you’ll catch luck there, but on the safer side is the bengal
It’s a cat, it’s cute and and UR so it’ll always Be worth something. Perhaps a bit less payoff but definitely a good pick
doggoesmeow wrote:
♔ Salem ♔ wrote:doggoesmeow wrote:
It's about fair ~ your pet is worth 2 2010 rares / 2009 rare same as their side
DrMoneyBags wrote:♔ Salem ♔ wrote:doggoesmeow wrote:
It's about fair ~ your pet is worth 2 2010 rares / 2009 rare same as their side
Is their cat a re-release?
DrMoneyBags wrote:
I’d take the bengal or the CEG. The CEG I’ve noticed has some really weird demand with some people so you’ll catch luck there, but on the safer side is the bengal
It’s a cat, it’s cute and and UR so it’ll always Be worth something. Perhaps a bit less payoff but definitely a good pick
Direwolf_1411225 wrote:Omg those are all insane. I’m leaning towards recommending the last one... just ignore me
XxDragonScalesxX wrote:I was just wondering if this group + the Tess horse and the brown, black, and white dog from this trade would be fair for this entire group?
Any input would be greatly appreciated!
The first group contains 2077 pets that range from omg so common to common and the oldest pets are from 2011.
The second group contains 122 rares and the oldest pets are from 2009 and one pet is from 2008 however it's a rerelease.
Users browsing this forum: eufemia, Riley, Scarlet Janefox and 4 guests