

Zetirian wrote:
The Zebras are stated to be the rarest pet on CS. Personally, I wouldn’t know where to put the UR Strawberry on a list other than at the bottom as it is a new OMGSR.
The rarity tag is the same. The difference is that one pet has been rarer than the other. That is if the pet is the plains zebra, the colour of my phone is terrible.
Regardless, I believe that this is unfair to the Zebra, but I wouldn’t know by how much exactly. I’d say more than the dog you have there for sure, but maybe a “former mainlist VR near the “big gap?”” To make it a known even? Maybe a sorbet? I don’t know. :(
That guesstimate is legitimately a shot in the dark. I would recommend that you and your trading partner talk it out and see what you guys can do.user 1 wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=79540919&userid=748575&signature=d5bRdRDYdti4MHxjJyJeUQ
have had different opinions within a discord server, would like a few more💕
I’d honestly say that it’s still unfair to the 08 dog. Maybe by a 08 uncommon(which there is none so maybe a 12 Rare?)
Even though it is a store pet, it is still only a rare. It can’t work the way it used to bc the cheetahs are rare and that a rare store pet is worth a rare ‘10 Rare doesn’t apply here bc they are rare. That’s it. Rare within the three month rule for now, maybe up to 4 year rule in the future. The 2016 store pet that is very rare could work to equal a 10 Rare but the other pets cannot work using this system as they are only rare.
Even with that said, the time factor from the above post works with this one as well.
First one is unfair to them. Those pets are 09 rares and the store pets as VR’s are worth more yes, but not at Rare 09 level yet.
The second one I would say is unfair to you by maybe another 10 Rare. I’m not going by the list here, but it is worth noting that this pet is worth a little bit more than a straight swap.
Drastically unfair to the rat. I counted roughly 33 09 rares on your side. I personally say (just me for now) that a OMGSR is worth 100+ 09 rares (at least it isn’t 10,000 like it used to be.) due to the rarity overhaul.
I just auctioned a zodiac dog set and they were, co i sighting with the list, went for around a mid advent list. I got a light leopard for them, a pet that should of belonged on the mid advent list. So that’s what I’m Worthing them at.
Even then it’s still unfair to the rat. Demand is up to you to determine, not anyone else :)

Nick wrote:Right now the rarities are:
OMG so rare! (less than 1 pet per 1000 users)
Very rare (less than 1 pet per 80 users)
Rare (less than 1 pet per 25 users)
Uncommon (less than 1 pet per 5.5 users)
Common (less than 1 pet per 3 users)
Very common (more than 1 pet per 3 users)
OMG so common (???)

Zetirian wrote:
For me however. The biggest problem is people who ask about auctions. They aren’t looking for fair trades, they’re looking for what is worth the most for their pet.
So for me, why should these posts be allowed on FTT when they aren’t looking for fairness?

~ V ~ wrote:At this point, I’m wondering if anyone has started counting how many regular 09’ rares there are left. If we are counting how many lists per there are, why not count a few 09’ rares to see the gap? Maybe then we could figure something out? I seriously have no idea but everything is a bit of a mess right now. I don’t even know if that’s how the new lists are working out. I’m slowly losing a bit of faith ahah




Users browsing this forum: Eevee55, EmberFlare, myworld1000, Riley, s t y x and 0 guests