even for the rare alone their side would not be enough. it is 4 uc = 1 rare of the same year
Doctor Dawnstar. wrote:I know rarity wise a nick laptop is an uncommon of of it's year rarity wise, but by demand how much is it usually able to get? I was offered an '09 rare + '18 Rare for it, but was wondering if that was fair demand wise or if it could fetch a bit more?
Ciapek wrote:
boof
Ꭺlina wrote:I posted a similar trade yesterday, but would still love to get some opinions on this:
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79169386&userid=261955&signature=wHGHxtaQqTxrKJM1v8sEFw
Thank you in advance!



A l u r i i y wrote:»»————-
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79108444&userid=832853&signature=BMBdAtMYeaK7hyWtfvbR3Q
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79111705&userid=832853&signature=TkDy-AfwX7iQGjuixMdluw
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79163513&userid=832853&signature=JcFyz6fEcTQZRNcAb954nQ
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79178080&userid=832853&signature=3sZjiVNjoeuS8RmgllS3AA
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79183098&userid=832853&signature=VxLXXIvCpiVarq-Ijkg7ag
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79183388&userid=832853&signature=Ig9waOWTZzOlcP1cQ1hL8A
————-««
Any opinions???? X c:
JJdiner wrote:A l u r i i y wrote:»»————-
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79108444&userid=832853&signature=BMBdAtMYeaK7hyWtfvbR3Q
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79111705&userid=832853&signature=TkDy-AfwX7iQGjuixMdluw
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79163513&userid=832853&signature=JcFyz6fEcTQZRNcAb954nQ
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79178080&userid=832853&signature=3sZjiVNjoeuS8RmgllS3AA
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79183098&userid=832853&signature=VxLXXIvCpiVarq-Ijkg7ag
trades/viewtrade.php?id=79183388&userid=832853&signature=Ig9waOWTZzOlcP1cQ1hL8A
————-««
Any opinions???? X c:
1. fair t7 = 7-8, t6 = 6.25 + 1 = 7.25
2. unfair, their side is only a 2010, a quarter of yours' worth
3. unfairfair 6ma = 5ma + 1la + 1ma, they would need to add 3-5 09s/ 1la
4. unfair as i said before
5. unfair 2 ma + 1 la vs 6ma
6. very unfair yours is worth a 2009, theirs is only worth a 2010


master_of_galifey wrote:what about this?
master_of_galifey wrote:master_of_galifey wrote:what about this?
how is the link 'wrong'? It works for me...
Users browsing this forum: myworld1000 and 3 guests