trades/viewtrade.php?id=78866957&userid=686698&signature=n79KUxv6k87BfePa1cg2vQ
Was this a fair trade? I don't quite understand the new rarity system and was curious which side overpayed?
RiverRaven wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78866957&userid=686698&signature=n79KUxv6k87BfePa1cg2vQ
Was this a fair trade? I don't quite understand the new rarity system and was curious which side overpayed?
stardustrial wrote:patriciaツ wrote:stardustrial wrote:are these both fair? if so, which one should i accept?
https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=79016722&userid=952073&signature=yDpjle2aCR1yFVOEvfCFWw
https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=79025116&userid=952073&signature=HBhAzfgO4gNBvk4CkhRjuwcompletely depends on how you value the red cerb. i value it at 2-3 nons. the raven at 1.5-2, and the beg at 1-1.5 nons. the first trade, i'd definitely consider. again, it depends on what you value the pets at. second trade is based on how much you value quantity. personally, i'd heavily consider both these offers
thank you! can i get a second opinion?
Do you laugh about me whenever I leave?
Or do I still need more therapy?(fake out)



.CherryCola. wrote:This fair? trades/viewtrade.php?id=79025835&userid=948661&signature=P3MMqxyt7A3yC2BK6rwGBA
Puptarts wrote:RiverRaven wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78866957&userid=686698&signature=n79KUxv6k87BfePa1cg2vQ
Was this a fair trade? I don't quite understand the new rarity system and was curious which side overpayed?
You overpaid. the rbm is omgsr and therefore worth more than the joker which i really dont see ever becoming omgsr. i personally would not have sent this trade but demand values are up to you.
Animall wrote:patriciaツ wrote:stardustrial wrote:are these both fair? if so, which one should i accept?
https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=79016722&userid=952073&signature=yDpjle2aCR1yFVOEvfCFWw
https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=79025116&userid=952073&signature=HBhAzfgO4gNBvk4CkhRjuwcompletely depends on how you value the red cerb. i value it at 2-3 nons. the raven at 1.5-2, and the beg at 1-1.5 nons. the first trade, i'd definitely consider. again, it depends on what you value the pets at. second trade is based on how much you value quantity. personally, i'd heavily consider both these offers
I just wrote up a reply on the last page ^^
I disagree with the beg trading for 1.5 nons. Only true dates fetch that, and even then it’s difficult. BEGs are only worth 2 sorbets, and people are assuming it’s really worth a non when it’s only demand that makes it that way. It’s demand on top of demand. It’s greedy. Nobody is really willing to pay 1.5 nons, people just ask for it.
My reply is on the last page if you wish to read it <3

RiverRaven wrote:Puptarts wrote:RiverRaven wrote:https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78866957&userid=686698&signature=n79KUxv6k87BfePa1cg2vQ
Was this a fair trade? I don't quite understand the new rarity system and was curious which side overpayed?
You overpaid. the rbm is omgsr and therefore worth more than the joker which i really dont see ever becoming omgsr. i personally would not have sent this trade but demand values are up to you.
I sent this as a bid before the rarity was changed, and after it got accepted. Demand wise is the RBM worth more than the joker, even though the joker is higher on the list?
Stygian Jinoga wrote:.CherryCola. wrote:This fair? trades/viewtrade.php?id=79025835&userid=948661&signature=P3MMqxyt7A3yC2BK6rwGBAUnfair to you. The pets on their side don't add up to the value of the BW.









