The "Is this a fair trade?" Thread

[popping star]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78049560&userid=907285&signature=NWEAlOBUeMsikXBhnOHeGA

Is this fair? I don’t think so but I might be wrong

Unfair to you due to the date gaps.

2014 rare = 2012 uncommon

The pets on the top are too recent to add up to your pets. ^^

[rosytea]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78032884&userid=822010&signature=SywSGXAxpkUGmO9u_7e_zw
hello! can someone please help me with this?

[최종호]

I've been trying to figure out how balanced this trade is.
I gave a shot at calculating based on year alone (not considering month or anything), and it came out slightly lopsided (a difference of one '12 rare's worth between the sides, with my side being underpay?). Seeing as I didn't consider anything besides year, as well as the fact that I'm still getting the hang of this, though, I'm not sure if any of that is actually accurate. I'd really appreciate some advice, thanks c:

Alright so if you're only considering year, then the trade is underpay on your side. They are overpaying by about a 2011 uncommon + some, so you are just about correct. I believe a fair estimate would be a 2012 rare

[kkspecial4]

I've been trying to figure out how balanced this trade is.
I gave a shot at calculating based on year alone (not considering month or anything), and it came out slightly lopsided (a difference of one '12 rare's worth between the sides, with my side being underpay?). Seeing as I didn't consider anything besides year, as well as the fact that I'm still getting the hang of this, though, I'm not sure if any of that is actually accurate. I'd really appreciate some advice, thanks c:

Alright so if you're only considering year, then the trade is underpay on your side. They are overpaying by about a 2011 uncommon + some, so you are just about correct. I believe a fair estimate would be a 2012 rare

Just looking at rarity alone, I agree that this is underpay on the bottom side
As the top adds up to 2 2009 Rares + 1 2010 Uncommon
And the bottom adds up to 2 2009 Rares + slightly over 1 2015 Uncommon

However, I disagree slightly on the fairness of this trade.
The Malk Cat is an Early 2009 Very Rare worth 2 Early 2009 Rares
The Rainbow Horses on the top are both Mid 2009 Rares
So, technically this is unfair to the bottom by the difference between the Early and Mid 2009 Rares - which is not covered by the 2010 Uncommon

[dustmeep]

trades/viewtrade.php?id=78044245&userid=506060&signature=PD1Oqpc8rcUX53_ox-8XKg

[muted.wolf]

Bid (image heavy, 72 pets) on my UR Purple Horse. Advice on store pet values?

Quick reference since it is image heavy, 60 C$, 6 '18 store pets, 5 '17 Store Pets, 2 '16 Store Pets, 1 '15 Store Pet, 1 '13 Store Pet, 2 '09 Rares, 1 '09 VR, 50+ UCs from 10-18, and a couple of newer rares if I got my facts right.

I also have a straight 455C$ bid, I believe that's the current accepted C$ worth? Any thoughts on that?

[the]

https://www.chickensmoothie.com/trades/viewtrade.php?id=78044245&userid=506060&signature=PD1Oqpc8rcUX53_ox-8XKg

The gap between the blue toxic and sorbet is a red x pps or 10 mid advents. Your side is worth roughly 1.5, so they're overpaying.

[3000feet]

What do you all think about this? Any help is greatly appreciated <3
trades/viewtrade.php?id=78038153&userid=116838&signature=w9Hgs9qwPX-SSF1FF_KX4Q

[GhostPants]

I’m not too sure about this trade? I really like my true dates.. but idk if it’s fair to them ?
XXX
Gasoline

[Doglike]

Is this fair? I know it's hard to determine with the unknown rarity of the advent pet, but.
Thank you for your help!